| Catalog Number |
0010301 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Abdominal Pain (1685); Adhesion(s) (1695); Inflammation (1932); Hernia (2240)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2015
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-mar-2007) is considered to be a best estimate.This mdr represents the ventralex mesh (device 2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the ventralex mesh (device 1).Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Per information provided: on (b)(6) 2007 - patient was diagnosed with umbilical and epigastric hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventralex mesh (device 1 and 2).Per op notes, ¿two hernias were identified, umbilical hernia and epigastric hernia.The defect was noted to be above the umbilicus and one in the right of umbilicus.The hernia sac and contents were excised.The ventral hernial defect was repaired with ventralex mesh (device 1) and epigastric hernia was repaired with ventralex mesh (device 2).The original defect was also closed with mayo technique¿ on (b)(6) 2011 ¿ patient was diagnosed with suprapubic recurrent ventral hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of synthetic mesh and biological mesh.Per op notes, ¿the recurrent defect was noted to be bulging.An elliptical incision was made along the old suprapubic and towards the right sided incision.Scar tissue was then excised.The hernia was identified.A synthetic mesh was placed in the intraperitoneal space and secured to the anterior abdominal wall with sutures.A biological mesh was then placed through the top of the connective tissue and secured." on (b)(6) 2015 - patient was diagnosed with incarcerated recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with excision of ventralex mesh (device 1 and 2).Per op notes, ¿a lower midline incision was made.An incarcerated intra-abdominal fat which had necrosed was noted.The old mesh (device 1 and 2) against the bowel was noted to be free.The mesh (device 1 and 2) were removed.The small bowel adhesions were taken down around the hernia repair.The defect was closed primarily with sutures.¿.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|