• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Codes Mechanical Jam (2983); Ejection Problem (4009)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/05/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a4, a5, a6: unknown/not provided.Section d6a: if implanted, give date: unknown/not provided; reported as both partial insertion and lens inserted and removed during same procedure.Section d6b: if explanted, give date: unknown/not provided; reported as both partial insertion and lens inserted and removed during same procedure.Section e1: telephone number: (b)(6).Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of the device history record and complaint trending for this device will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, no definitive response has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a preloaded monofocal intraocular lens (iol) got stuck at the tip of the cartridge.The lens was partially inserted.It was also reported the lens was inserted in the patient's right eye and removed during the same procedure.The patient fully recovered.The directions for use were followed, and there was a delay in the procedure, but no additional medical intervention was required outside of standard care.There were no vitrectomy, incision enlargement, or sutures required.No other information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional info: further information was provided and clarified that the lens was partially inserted.It was unknown if there was patient injury.Another johnson & johnson lens (same model and diopter) was implanted as a replacement.The product was discarded.No other information was provided.Device evaluation: the device was not returned at the manufacturing site; therefore, product testing could not be performed and the customer¿s reported complaint could not be verified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing records for the intraocular lens were reviewed.The product was manufactured according to specifications.A search of complaints related to this production order (po) was performed.The search of complaints revealed one similar complaint for this production order number and although the complaint issue reported is related, the issue could not be confirmed as related to manufacturing.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation there is no indication of a product quality deficiency, and the reported issue could not be confirmed.Corrected data: the following section has been updated accordingly: section h6: health effect - impact code: the code provided in the initial report 4627 is no longer applicable.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: in reviewing the file, it was determined that the reported delivery issue no longer meets the reporting criteria for a reportable malfunction.It was clarified that the lens was not fully inserted in the patient's right eye as it was partially inserted and removed during the same procedure.Therefore, this event is no longer considered a reportable malfunction as there was no report of additional surgical maneuvers.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key24492198
Report Number3012236936-2026-000057
Device Sequence Number17416190
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731493
UDI-Public(01)05050474731493(17)270629
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCA
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/29/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0070
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/05/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/18/2026
05/28/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/02/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/11/2026
05/28/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/29/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age56 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-