| Catalog Number |
8065990941 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Unexpected Therapeutic Results (1631)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
12/26/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H.3., h.6.: investigation, including root cause analysis, is in progress.A supplemental mdr will be filed as necessary in accordance with 21 cfr 803.56 when additional reportable information becomes available.The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
A healthcare professional reported that during creation of the flap, the corneal flap was thin near the side cut at the ten o¿clock position, adhesion at flap edge was difficult to separate the flap in the unknown eye of a patient, during refractive surgery.The symptoms were resolved and the patient were now recovered.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information provided in d.9., h.3., h.6., and h.11.A review of the device history record (dhr) traceable to the reported serial number indicates that the product was processed and released according to the product¿s acceptance criteria.A review of the technical service onsite history showed no abnormalities that could have contributed to this event: system was successfully verified after the surgery date.Most recent onsite visit from field service engineer performed and signed service installation record.System meets specification as per service installation record.During onsite visit the field service engineer replaced application interface and beam expander.Field service engineer performed system verification as per service installation record.The review of logfile for the day of treatment shows all laser system functions were within specifications.The treatment of the patient's left eye was finished successfully without any technical issue.The thickness of the flap was thinner than the recommended flap thickness.No technical root cause could be identified during logfile review.The system was working within specification.The replaced part is expected to be returned to manufacturer for evaluation but has not been returned.No device related issues were identified based on the provided data.The investigation showed patient and/or handling related factors, that may contribute to an outcome similar to the reported event.Therefore, the case is coded as "inconclusive - other".The manufacturer internal reference number is: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|