|
Product complaint #(b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no related non-conformances were identified.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: - were there any unexpected outcomes or complications as a result of the prolonged surgery time? the patient was ok.We had to prolong their anesthesia time due to needing xray to find needle tip.- was the needle piece retrieved during the same procedure? what efforts were made to retrieve the broken piece (e.G.Conversion from laprascopic procedure to open) yes, the needle tip was retrieved during the same procedure.Radiology had to come and use xray to find the broken piece in the patient¿s internal cavity.- what tissue was being sutured when the event occurred? fascia - was there any change in the patient¿s post-operative care due to the prolonged procedure? no.
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Date sent to the fda: 4/1/2026.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.H6 component code: g07002 no device problem found.H6 component code: c22 - photo analysis.Additional information: d9, h3, h6.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.H3 investigational summary: the product was returned to ethicon for evaluation.One open box with twelve (12) representative unopened samples was received for analysis.Product code vcp329h.A photograph was also provided showing a single needle¿suture assembly with the needle fractured into two pieces inside a plastic container.Upon initial inspection of the sample, no external damage was observed on the external packet.In order to evaluate the condition of the returned samples, the packets were opened.The swage and attachment area were noted to be as expected.The tip and body of the needles were examined under magnification, and no defects or needle breakage were found.In addition, the samples were tested by resistance test to needles and met the requirements.As part of ethicon quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.The event described could not be confirmed as the device performed without any difficulties noted.Although no product defect was identified, there may have been other circumstances or issues that occurred during the use of the device that could not be replicated during the laboratory analysis.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.Additional h3 investigational summary: the product received for analysis was vcp329h.Visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.A failed suture needle, was submitted for fractographic evaluation.The component was identified as product code vcp329h.It was requested that hsa assess the fracture mode of the failure.A fracture was observed in the body of the needle.The needle was received in two pieces, only one of the mating fracture surfaces was examined for this evaluation.A scanning electron microscope was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation revealed the fracture was composed predominantly of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile fracture mode.Mechanical damage observed coincidental to the fracture provides additional evidence that the failure was induced by mechanical deformation leading to ductile overload.This was a ductile fracture.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals is conducted through complaint trending as part of post-market surveillance.
|