|
B2, h1: a risk to the patient's health could not be excluded for these specific circumstances, since a biopsy was performed in a different location in the brain than anticipated and planned with the brainlab navigation involved, although according to the surgeon (treating clinician): the purpose of the surgery was to only receive diagnostic samples and not to remove the lesion and/or treat the disease.The deviation of the actual biopsy path performed in the brain from the intended trajectory was detected after the surgery, following negative histological results.The patient experienced minor loss of vision on the left eye due to the deviating surgical actions performed in the brain with the aid of navigation.The effect persists (although improving) at the current point in time.The outcome of the revision biopsy was successful as intended with diagnostic results that included the pathological tissue required for diagnosis.There was no other harm or negative effect to the patient due to deviating navigated actions, also not due to the prolongation of the anesthesia (due to second biopsy) of ca.90min.There were no further medical/surgical remedial actions reported to be necessary, done or planned for this patient.Hospitalization of the patient was not prolonged.H6: according to the results of the brainlab investigation and the information provided by the hospital, it can be concluded that the root cause of the biopsy trajectory deviating from its intended entry and target points, performed with the aid of navigation, is: an insufficient distribution of surface registration points acquired by the user for the patient anatomy registration to navigation, not following brainlab requirements.The provided data from this surgery shows that registration points were acquired with the softouch on areas of skin shift, such as the cheek and around the side of the head where the patient had an indentation from ear protection in the data set.Points were missing from the top, back, and both sides of the head.Viewing the pre-registration points with the pre-registration calculation compared to the final registration calculation reveals a shift in the point cloud of the registration.This caused the navigation software to not find an as accurate as desired match, for this specific procedure, between the pre-operative image dataset and the actual patient anatomy, in the region of interest.Apparently, the resulting deviation of the instrument locations display by the navigation compared to their positions on and in the actual patient anatomy, was not entirely recognized by the user with the necessary navigation accuracy verification of the registration, and continuously throughout the procedure.There is no indication of a systematic error or malfunction of the brainlab device (navigation).Corresponding brainlab measures to minimize this anticipated risk as low as reasonably practicable are already in place.H7: brainlab intends to re-iterate the relevant topics regarding the use of the device to this customer.
|
|
Cranial surgery for a diagnostic biopsy of a fusiform gyrus lesion region (5cm in depth, 0,6ml in size) was performed with the aid of brainlab cranial navigation (cranial/ ent 3.1) a trajectory was planned before the surgery on pre-operative mri scans acquired for this patient.Four biopsy passes were intended and executed using a navigated third-party biopsy needle.The initial histology was non-tumorous suggesting sampling outside the intended brainlab guided trajectory, confirmed by post operative ct imaging demonstrating that the biopsy trajectory deviated medially and posteriorly (5-6 mm at the entry point and 2-3 mm at the target).According to the surgeon (treating clinician): the purpose of the surgery was to only receive diagnostic samples and not to remove the lesion and/or treat the disease.The deviation of the actual biopsy path performed in the brain from the intended trajectory was detected after the surgery, following negative histological results.The patient experienced minor loss of vision on the left eye due to the deviating surgical actions performed in the brain with the aid of navigation.The effect persists (although improving) at the current point in time.The outcome of the revision biopsy was successful as intended with diagnostic results that included the pathological tissue required for diagnosis.There was no other harm or negative effect to the patient due to deviating navigated actions, also not due to the prolongation of the anesthesia (due to second biopsy) of ca.90min.There were no further medical/surgical remedial actions reported to be necessary, done or planned for this patient.Hospitalization of the patient was not prolonged either.
|