|
D2a common device name - updated.H3 device evaluated by mfg ¿updated.F10 / h6 device code grid -updated.F10 / h6 medical device problem code - device code grid - updated.F10 / h6 clinical signs code grid - health effect - clinical code - updated.F10 / h6 health impact code grid - health effect - impact code - updated.Due to the automated manufacturing execution system (mes) there are controls in the manufacturing process to ensure the product met specifications upon release.During visual/microscopic inspection, the microcatheter was returned with a stent partially deployed from the distal tip.The stent was loaded on the stent delivery wire (sdw).The device was unable to be flushed.One of the stent's struts had pieced through the lumen of the microcatheter.The stent was unable to be advanced or retracted due to the stent strut.The stent was able to be manually removed from the microcatheter.During functional inspection, a 0.023" pin gauge was verified to meet the catheter shaft when inserted into the catheter hub.A 0.0158" patency mandrel was able to be advanced through the microcatheter, no friction was noted.The reported complaint could not be confirmed during analysis as the device problem is unknown/unclear.The device failed to meet specification when received for complaint investigation based on the analyzed anomalies noted to the device.The reported event is covered in the device directions for use (dfu).As well, the risk of the reported event is documented in the risk documentation and there are current controls to mitigate the risk of the as reported event.It was reported that '' the stent was delivered through the sl10 microcatheter to the anterior communicating artery.The physician then retracted the sl10 microcatheter to deploy the stent, and the distal end of the stent opened smoothly.The physician continued to retract the sl10 microcatheter, but when attempting to fully deploy the stent, it was found that the sl10 microcatheter could not be retracted.Despite repeated attempts to retract it, the stent remained stuck inside the sl10, and the microcatheter could not be retracted to deploy the stent.Subsequently, the physician withdrew both the stent and the sl10 microcatheter out of the body together.'' additional information provided by the customer did not indicate any issues noted during unpacking or set up of the device, and the device was prepared as per dfu instructions.Continuous flush was set up and maintained throughout the clinical procedure.There was no indication of a user related issue.The anatomy was reported to be moderately tortuous.There was no allegation against the sl10 microcatheter used with the subject stent.No excessive force was applied at any point while advancing the stent within the microcatheter.There was no damage noted to the stent or the stent delivery wire (sdw) prior to use.The size of the stent was appropriate for treatment site.The stent delivery microcatheter was retracted in a continuous movement while maintaining the position of the stent delivery wire.The position of the stent was confirmed under fluoroscopy.Analysis of the returned device found the sl-10 microcatheter was returned with a stent partially deployed from the distal tip.One of the stent's struts had pieced through the lumen of the microcatheter and as a result, the stent was unable to be advanced or retracted through the microcatheter shaft.The stent was able to be manually removed from the microcatheter.A 0.023" pin gauge was verified to meet the catheter shaft when inserted into the catheter hub and when a 0.0158" patency mandrel was advanced through the microcatheter, no friction was noted.It should be noted the stent was successfully ¿delivered through the sl10 microcatheter to the anterior communicating artery¿ which indicates the microcatheter was functioning as intended up to this point.However, while retracting the stent back into the microcatheter shaft a force must have been applied to cause the stent strut to pierce through the microcatheter lumen which subsequently resulted in the stent becoming stuck in the microcatheter.An assignable cause of undeterminable was assigned for the reported ¿device problem unknown/unclear¿ as the device problem is unknown/unclear.An assignable cause of procedural factors was assigned to the as analyzed 'device difficult to flush¿ and ¿catheter shaft has hole/perforation¿ as the issue is associated with a product that meets stryker design and manufacture specifications and was used in according with the dfu but due to procedural and/or anatomical factors during use, the product performance was limited.
|