• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORPORATION ARTISAN?; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORPORATION ARTISAN?; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF Back to Search Results
Model Number SC-8216-70
Medical Device Problem Codes High impedance (1291); Migration (4003)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Fall (1848)
Date of Event 11/11/2025
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Block b3: exact date approximated, event occurred a month prior to the date the manufacturer became aware of the event.Additional suspect medical device components involved in the event: product family: scs-extension.Upn: m365sc3138350.Model: sc-3138-35.Serial: (b)(6) batch: 202283.Udi: (b)(4).Product family: scs-extension.Upn: m365sc3138350.Model: sc-3138-35 serial: (b)(6) batch: 202239 udi: (b)(4).
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient's spinal cord stimulator (scs) leads had migrated causing high impedance.Imaging was taken and spinal cord stimulation (scs) lead migration was confirmed.The patient underwent a procedure wherein the paddle lead was replaced.The explanted lead was discarded by the medical facility and will not be returned.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient's spinal cord stimulator (scs) leads had migrated causing high impedance.Imaging was taken and spinal cord stimulation (scs) lead migration was confirmed.The patient underwent a procedure wherein the paddle lead was replaced.The explanted lead was discarded by the medical facility and will not be returned.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation results: all explanted devices were not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.Device history record: it was confirmed that all devices met manufacturing specification prior to distribution and there were no manufacturing deviations which could have contributed to the reported event.Labeling review: review of the instructions for use (ifu) confirmed there was relevant content and sufficient guidance with respect to the circumstances described within this complaint.No updates are required to the ifu as a result of this event.Investigation conclusion: all explanted devices were not returned for analysis and the complaint as reported could not be confirmed.Record review revealed no additional information related to the complaint.Therefore, this investigation is unable to determine a probable cause for the complaint and the conclusion code known inherent risk of device will be used.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARTISAN?
Common Device Name
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORPORATION
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia CA 91355
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Manufacturer Contact
erik sherburne
25155 rye canyon loop
valencia, CA 91355
7632920920
MDR Report Key24505897
Report Number3006630150-2026-01249
Device Sequence Number16056299
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier08714729779919
UDI-Public(01)08714729779919(17)111231(10)272958
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNC
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P030017
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2010
Device Explanted Year2026
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/04/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date12/31/2011
Device Model NumberSC-8216-70
Device Catalogue NumberSC-8216-70
Device Lot Number272958
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/11/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/12/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/04/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/04/2026
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age67 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-