|
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. GII PS HI FLEX ISRT SZ 5-6 9MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
71421515 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Joint Dislocation (2374)
|
| Date of Event |
02/11/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, after a tka had been performed on (b)(6) 2025, the gii ps hi flex isrt sz 5-6 9mm dislocated.This adverse event was addressed by performing a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2026, during which, the gii ps hi flex isrt sz 5-6 9mm was exchanged to an equivalent insert.Patient's current health status is unknown.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).This complaint was opened by smith+nephew to document a patient complication reported that includes reference to the use of a smith+nephew product without evidence about a specific product problem.The reported complication relates to known inherent procedural risks that are appropriately documented in our risk files.Smith+nephew will continue to monitor trends in accordance with our post-market surveillance process and take necessary action as required if anticipated severity and/or occurrence rates are exceeded.Smith+nephew has no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Based on our review of all currently available information, we are unable to confirm a relationship between the reported event and the device or identify a definitive root cause.However, as the use of our product cannot be excluded as a potential cause or contributory factor to the reported issue, we are submitting this report in accordance with applicable regulations.If additional investigative findings or information becomes available that alters the conclusions of this report, a follow-up report will be submitted as required.H11: e1 (phone number) (b)(6).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, after a tka had been performed on (b)(6)2025, the gii ps hi flex isrt sz 5-6 9mm dislocated.This adverse event was addressed by performing a revision surgery on (b)(6)2026, during which, the gii ps hi flex isrt sz 5-6 9mm was exchanged to an equivalent insert.Patient is currently doing well.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Internal complaint reference:(b) (4)
additional information: b5: describe event or problem, h6: type of investigation and investigation findings
h11: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a device analysis could not be performed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that.¿ the provided photocopied x-rays (b)(6)2025 show a shadow protruding anteriorly in the articulating joint space consistent with an anteriorly displaced insert which supports the complaint.Post-revision images (b)(6)2025 do not provide insight into the root cause of the event and immediate post-implantation images were not provided.Successful locking of the primary articulating insert cannot be confirmed in the imaging.The instructions for use for knee systems revelaed that possible adverse effects includes dislocation which can result from trauma, improper implant selection, improper implant positioning, improper fixation, migration and/or muscle and fibrous tissue laxity.It is unknown if the patient experienced any precipitating trauma.Correspondence stated, ¿a few months postoperatively, the inlay dislocated¿ and ¿problem detected clinically + radiologically ¿and was resolved with an equivalent insert exchange.It was reported that the patient is doing well at the moment and the postoperative course has been unremarkable so far.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no evidence to conclude that the product failed to meet any specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include injury, patient condition, postoperative care, size selected or abnormal loading of limb.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|