|
The reported event could not be confirmed since the device was not returned for evaluation and no other evidence was provided.Upon further investigation of the ct scans by healthcare professionals, the following was observed: the construct is intact, well-fixed, and well-positioned, with no obvious reason for revision visible.Failure of total ankle replacement (tar) over time is a known complication.In cases involving a planned revision procedure, a medical opinion aimed at determining the root cause of the failure is part of the internal investigation process.Sufficient radiological and clinical information must be provided to enable a meaningful clinical assessment and to identify possible causes of failure.Where a ct scan is the only available clinical source, this assessment is limited.No conclusive statement can be provided because key clinical information, such as the patient¿s clinical status, exact symptoms, range of motion, and the treating physician¿s assessment, is missing.The root causes of radiographic findings such as radiolucent areas and bone cysts are often complex and multifactorial and cannot be scientifically determined without this decisive evidence.Due to these limitations, we are unable to provide statements regarding the patient, the procedure, or the device in relation to the cause of the failure.More detailed information about the complaint event and the affected device is required to determine the root cause of the complaint.A review of the device history record for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the labeling did not indicate any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing, or design-related problems were identified during the investigation.If the device is returned or additional information becomes available, the investigation will be reassessed.
|