|
|
| Catalog Number |
MC1820 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Failure to Fire (2610)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/09/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2026, a patient underwent a kidney biopsy procedure by using maxcore device.It was reported that during the procedure, the inner needle and ejector needle allegedly failed to eject synchronously, resulting in an ineffective section.No coaxial needle was used.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records is currently being performed.The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The investigation of the reported event is currently underway.Section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
H11: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed, and this lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: two maxcore disposable core biopsy instrument received.On visual testing in sample 1, the device appeared to be clean.The device was received with a needle protector and without a yellow guard attached to the needle.Instrument was received with both slides in their initial positions.No anomalies were noted to the device.In sample 2, the device appeared to have residue throughout the needle.The device was received with a needle protector and with a yellow guard attached to the needle.Instrument was returned half primed with the top slide pulled back and the bottom slide in the initial position, leaving the sample notch exposed.Upon functional testing in sample 1, to prime the top and the bottom slide was then pushed into the device and was able to lock into the device.The device was fully primed with no issues.The device was further tested by cocking and firing the device 3 times into the chicken breast.The device was able to prime and fire properly.All 6 samples were collected with no issue.In sample 2, due to the condition of device, no functional testing was performed.Therefore, the investigation is unconfirmed for the reported failure to fire in sample 1 as the device was able to prime, fire properly and all 6 samples were collected with no issue.However, the investigation is inconclusive for the reported reported failure to fire in sample 2 as functional was not performed due to the condition of the return sample.A definitive root cause for the reported failure to fire issue could not be determined based upon the provided information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.D4 (unique identifier (udi) #), g3, h6 (method, result, conclusion).Section a through f ¿ the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2026, a patient underwent a kidney biopsy procedure by using maxcore device.It was reported that during the procedure, the inner needle and ejector needle allegedly failed to eject synchronously, resulting in an ineffective section.No coaxial needle was used.The procedure was completed using another device.There was no reported patient injury.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|