|
|
| Catalog Number |
TSVMH11 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
07/24/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Zimvie complaint number:(b)(4).A4: weight unknown / not provided.G4: additional pma/510(k) number ¿ k013227.Product has been received by zimvie and the investigation is in process.Once the investigation has been completed, a follow-up mdr will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the implant at tooth site #12 was removed as it was fractured at the hex.On (b)(6) 2025, the patient was referred by the doctor of dental surgery to explore the implant.The abutment screw was loose but the doctor was unable to remove it.It was confirmed that the implant was fractured at the hex.The implant was removed and a puros graft was placed with membrane.A new implant was replaced on (b)(6) 2025.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
No additional event information received at the time of this report.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted to relay additional information and device evaluation.The following sections are being reported: b4: date of this report was updated.G3: date received by manufacturer was updated.G6: type of report was updated.H2: type of follow up was updated.H3: device evaluated by manufacturer was updated.H6: type of investigation code was added: 10, 4109, 3331 and 4111.H6: investigation findings code was added: 3252.H6: investigation conclusions code was added: 4307.H11: narrative/data was updated.Zimvie received the reported device for evaluation.Visual evaluation was performed, a fracture has been identified on the implants collar.Dhr review was completed for the subject lot number.No deviations or non-conformances, which could have caused or contributed to the reported event, were noted as part of the dhr.Complaint history review was performed for the reported lot number, for similar events and no other complaint was identified.The customer did not submit images for the reported event.Based on the investigation and risk management file review, the most likely root cause determined from the investigation was clinician selects implant that is unable to resist long-term occlusal loading.Therefore, based on the available information, a device malfunction did occur.The fracture has been identified on the collar.The reported event was confirmed.No further investigation or immediate capa / hhe/d escalation is required, as the complaint investigation did not confirm the products were nonconforming at the time of distribution, and no new failure mode, harm, or hazardous situation was identified through the investigation performed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|