• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DCB00
Medical Device Problem Code Ejection Problem (4009)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/10/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2, a3, a4, and a5: per regulation eu (b)(4) (general data protection regulation), patient identifiers were not collected or recorded and therefore are not available.Section d6b - explant date: n/a - lens remains implanted; therefore, not explanted.Section e1: (b)(6).Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of this review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during implantation of the preloaded, monofocal, intraocular lens (iol) the haptic became stuck inside the cartridge when the iol was 90% delivered into the patient's eye.The surgeon used forceps to remove the iol from the cartridge and position the haptic within the capsular bag.There was no patient injury reported and no surgical intervention was required.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: section d9 - device available for evaluation? yes.Section d9 - date returned to manufacturer: 05-mar-2026.Section h3 - device evaluated by manufacturer? yes.Device evaluation: visual inspection of the complaint device revealed that the handpiece was received with the plunger rod fully advanced.Viscoelastic residue was observed throughout the cartridge.No issues were identified with the cartridge, lens module, device assembly, plunger rod, or plunger rod advancement.No lens was received for evaluation.The complaint issue "delivery issue" could not be confirmed during product evaluation, and no issues were identified.Conclusion: as a result of the investigation, there is no indication of a product quality deficiency.All pertinent information available to johnson and johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key24523789
Report Number3012236936-2026-000040
Device Sequence Number9723868
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474636149
UDI-Public(01)05050474636149(17)280916
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryUK
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2026
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/08/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDCB00
Device Catalogue NumberDCB0000230
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/10/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/13/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/05/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/08/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/15/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-