MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC CT LUCIA; CT LUCIA 602

Model Number	602
Medical Device Problem Code	Use of Device Problem (1670)
Health Effect - Clinical Code	Visual Impairment (2138)
Date of Event	01/13/2026
Type of Reportable Event	Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The device history records were reviewed and there were no non-conformities or deviations noted during the manufacturing of the lens that would have caused or contributed to the nature of this complaint.Additionally, our lenses are 100% inspected before they leave our manufacturing site.Therefore, we are confident that the lens was processed per standard operating procedures and inspections and have met all criteria for release.The device has not yet been returned for evaluation and therefore a proper root cause analysis could not be completed nor the reported issue confirmed.Without a proper device analysis, a definitive root cause cannot be determined at this time.Based on the information provided, the risk assessment for the lucia 3-piece product, and our experience, we have determined that the following factors may have caused or contributed to the reported issue: off-label use of the yamane technique: the ct lucia 602 lens is not validated for use with the yamane scleral fixation technique.This off-label method introduces rotational forces and anchoring dynamics that are not accounted for in the design specifications of the lens.In this case, the surgeon reported the haptic was damaged during lasering at the optic-haptic junction, which ultimately required explantation.The haptics, while ideal for traditional in-the bag implantation, may not provide the necessary resistance or stability when fixated externally via the yamane technique.
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that after surgery concluded, the doctor noticed a bent haptic on the ct lucia 602.The yamane technique was employed during the surgery.A second ct lucia 602 lens was implanted two weeks later.The patient's condition was good at the one-week post-operative visit.During the preparation for use, no damage was noted to the device.
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Description of changes: field b4: added "date of this report" 03/16/2026.Field g3: updated "date received by manufacturer" to "03/06/2026".Field g6: checked "30 days", updated to "follow-up, # 1".Field h2: checked "device evaluation".Field h3: updated "device evaluated by manufacturer?" to "yes".Field h6: added "type of investigation" code 10.Field h11: added description of changes.File attachments: attached device evaluation.

• Brand Name: CT LUCIA
• Common Device Name: CT LUCIA 602
• Manufacturer (Section D): CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC; 1040 s. vintage ave. bld. a; ontario CA 91761
• Manufacturer (Section G): CARL ZEISS MEDITEC PRODUCTION LLC; 1040 s. vintage ave. bld. a; ontario CA 91761
• Manufacturer Contact: manjaya hegde ; 5300 central parkway; dublin, CA 94568 ; 9252164697
• MDR Report Key: 24535919
• Report Number: 3010126268-2026-00014
• Device Sequence Number: 18726423
• Product Code: HQL
• UDI-Device Identifier: 00843045100966
• UDI-Public: (01)00843045100966(17)300331
• Combination Product (Y/N): N
• Initial Reporter State: WV
• Initial Reporter Country: US
• PMA/510(K) Number: P100016 S022
• Number of Events Summarized: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Device Implanted Year: 2026
• Device Explanted Year: 2026
• Serviced by Third Party (Y/N): Unknown
• Reporter Type: Manufacturer
• Report Source: Health Professional,User Facility
• Initial Reporter Occupation: Other Health Care Professional
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date (Section B): 03/16/2026

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Operator of Device: Health Professional
• Device Model Number: 602
• Device Catalogue Number: 003500-0050-675
• Device Lot Number: 3S250408
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Is the Reporter a Health Professional?: Yes
• Type of Report(Section G): Thirty-Day
• Initial Date Received by Manufacturer: 02/10/2026
• Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer: 03/06/2026
• Initial Report FDA Received Date: 03/06/2026
• Supplement Report FDA Received Date: 03/16/2026
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N): Yes
• Date Device Manufactured: 04/30/2025
• Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N): Yes
• Is This a Single-Use Device that was Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N): No
• Usage of Device: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event: Required Intervention
• Patient Sex: Unknown