• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Section a2, a3a, a3b, a4, a5 and a6: unknown/not provided since patient contact was unknown.Section b3: date of event: unknown; requested but not provided.The best estimate date is prior to feb 12, 2026 [alert date].Section d6a.If implanted, give date: unknown, information not provided.Section d6b.If explanted, give date: unknown, information not provided.Section h3: the device was not returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.A review of records including device history and complaint trending will be performed.Upon completion of the review, if there is any further relevant information a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Attempts were made to obtain the missing information; however, no additional information has been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a single piece preloaded monofocal intraocular lens (iol) was cracked.Patient contact is not known.No further information was provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The product was received for evaluation.Device evaluation: visual inspection of the complaint device reveal that the handpiece was received with the plunger rod partially advanced.Viscoelastic residue was observed throughout the cartridge.The cartridge tip and cartridge was damaged.No issues were identified with the lens module, device assembly, plunger rod, and plunger rod advancement.No lens was received for evaluation.The complaint issue "dc-lens damaged" was not identified during product evaluation.The other observed issues during the product evaluation could not be confirmed to be related to the manufacturing or design process.Conclusion: based on the complaint investigation results, the product was released within specification.No product deficiency or product malfunction could be identified.The following fields were updated accordingly: section d9: device available for evaluation? yes, section d9: date returned to manufacturer: feb 24, 2026, section h3: device evaluated by manufacturer: yes.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Common Device Name
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key24536914
Report Number3012236936-2026-000062
Device Sequence Number21425593
Product Code HQL
UDI-Device Identifier05050474731745
UDI-Public(01)05050474731745(17)281106
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P980040
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/07/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberDIB00U0195
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/12/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/12/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/06/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/07/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/06/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-