• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. COATED VICRYL; SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. COATED VICRYL; SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC Back to Search Results
Catalog Number J727D
Medical Device Problem Code Break (1069)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Date of Event 02/10/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown procedure on (b)(6) 2026 and suture was used.During the procedure, the needle point broke off and was unable to be found.Visual inspection plus x-ray was done.The surgeon determined any more dissection would be disruptive.There were no patient adverse consequences.Additional information was requested.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4) this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon inc, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon inc or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained: did any needle piece(s) fall into the patient? it is believed so *if yes, was\were the needle piece(s) retrieved during the same procedure? the surgeon did not locate the broken piece.Were x-rays taken to locate the needle piece(s)? yes.What measures were taken to retrieve the broken piece(s)? visual inspection plus x-ray.The surgeon determined any more dissection would be disruptive.Was there any additional tissue damage as a result of searching for the needle piece(s)? nothing reported.*if not retrieved, in what tissue structure the needle piece(s) were retained? is there any plan in place to remove the needle piece(s) in the future? please explain.Unknown at this time.Please provide the product code and lot number.Submitted with the return samples.Please provide the status of the device(s) as it has not been received for analysis.If the device has been shipped, please provide the shipment tracking details.Shipping device was sent today in the packaging provided.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Corrected information: d 9.Device available for evaluation?, h 3.Device evaluated by manufacturer? additional information: d 9.Date device returned to manufacturer, d 9.Is device returned to manufacturer?, h 6.Component code, h 6.Type of investigation, h 6.Investigation findings, h 6.Investigation conclusions h3 investigation summary: the product received for analysis was j727d.Visual inspection and metallurgical analysis were performed on the returned product.A failed suture needle, labeled as (b)(4), was submitted to herrera, stafford and associates, llc (hsa) for fractographic evaluation on february 24, 2026.The component was identified as product code j727d.It was requested that hsa assess the fracture mode of the failure.A fracture was observed at the tip of the needle.One side of the needle was received, the mating fracture surface was not provided for this evaluation.A scanning electron microscope (sem) was used to examine the fracture surfaces and surrounding area of the needle.The fracture surfaces were examined in multiple locations to determine the fracture mode.The evaluation of (b)(4) revealed the fracture was composed of microvoid coalescence, which is evidence of a ductile fracture mode.This was a ductile fracture.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number, and no non-conformances were identified.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COATED VICRYL
Common Device Name
SUTURE, ABSORBABLE, SYNTHETIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
1000 route 202
raritan NJ 08869
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.-JUAREZ
calle durango #2751
ciudad juarez 32575
MX   32575
Manufacturer Contact
orla o'mahony
1000 route 202
raritan, NJ 08869
3035526892
MDR Report Key24550211
Report Number2210968-2026-02406
Device Sequence Number18459601
Product Code GAM
UDI-Device Identifier10705031042582
UDI-Public(01)10705031042582(17)271231(10)TAMDQA
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateFL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K022269
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 03/25/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberJ727D
Device Lot NumberTAMDQA
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/10/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer02/24/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/09/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/25/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/10/2023
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-