• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SERF BI MENTUM PFRK PE LINER 22 43; BI MENTUM LINER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SERF BI MENTUM PFRK PE LINER 22 43; BI MENTUM LINER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number DS10014322
Medical Device Problem Code Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Joint Dislocation (2374)
Date of Event 02/25/2026
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803 (and/or part 4, as applicable).This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that the patient was revised due to dislocation.Affected side: left hip.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: although distributed by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, the product is designed, manufactured, and labeled by the manufacturing supplier.The requirement of fda reporting, complaint investigation, root cause, and corrective action is the responsibility of the designing supplier of this item, per the supplier agreement.The product/information will be transferred to the supplier with the complaint problem statement for investigation.The results of the supplier investigation are to be populated into the depuy synthes customer quality complaint management system.Per the supplier agreement, the supplier is responsible for any corrective actions identified during the complaint investigation process.An analysis of the product could not be performed since a physical sample was not received for evaluation.An evaluation of the manufacturing record could not be performed as the required product identification number was not provided to complete the evaluation.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending as part of the post-market surveillance.However, if the product is received at a later date, the investigation will be updated as applicable.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.Added: d10 concomitant.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: although distributed by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, the product is designed, manufactured, and labeled by the manufacturing supplier.The requirement of fda reporting, complaint investigation, root cause, and corrective action is the responsibility of the designing supplier of this item, per the supplier agreement.The product/information will be transferred to the supplier with the complaint problem statement for investigation.The results of the supplier investigation are to be populated into the depuy synthes customer quality complaint management system.Per the supplier agreement, the supplier is responsible for any corrective actions identified during the complaint investigation process.The following investigation was provided by the supplier legal manufacturer: device evaluation and results: not performed as product was not returned.-clinician review: no medical records were received for review with a clinical consultant.-device history review: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.The exact cause of the event could not be determined because insufficient information was provided.Additional information including operative reports, progress notes, x-rays and return of the device are needed to fully investigate the event.If further information becomes available or the product is returned, this investigation will be re-opened.As part of depuy synthes quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.No further investigation with regard to this complaint is required.The supplier will continue to monitor for trends.Device history lot: all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BI MENTUM PFRK PE LINER 22 43
Common Device Name
BI MENTUM LINER
Manufacturer (Section D)
SERF
85 avenue des bruyères
décines-charpieu 69150
FR  69150
MDR Report Key24558274
Report Number1818910-2026-150001
Device Sequence Number18357879
Product Code LPH
UDI-Device Identifier03662200015504
UDI-Public03662200015504
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateNC
Initial Reporter CountryUS
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2025
Device Explanted Year2026
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Importer
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/24/2026
Report Date (Section F) 03/10/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2026
Device Catalogue NumberDS10014322
Device Lot Number2009453A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Distributor Facility Aware Date04/23/2026
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer Not provided
Supplement Date Received by ManufacturerNot provided
Not provided
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/10/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/26/2026
04/24/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured09/21/2021
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
ARTICUL/EZE BALL 22.225+7 NK.; PINNACLE DM LINER 50_43.
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age55 YR
Patient SexFemale
Date Report Sent to FDA03/10/2026
-
-