|
|
| Model Number |
VXSK0134 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Human-Device Interface Problem (2949); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Cardiac Perforation (2513); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
|
| Date of Event |
02/17/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a farapulse procedure to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a fib), a versacross access solutions kit, non-boston scientific diagnostic catheter, and farawave catheter were selected for use.It was reported that during the procedure, the physician utilized intracardiac echocardiography (ice) to see the presence of a trace pericardial effusion prior to performing the transseptal puncture (tsp).The physician then performed an ice guided tsp with a versacross access solutions kit.No change in effusion noted.The heart was mapped with a non-boston scientific diagnostic catheter, and the physician noted left superior pulmonary vein (lspv) and left atrial appendage (laa) were extremely close.As soon as the non-boston scientific diagnostic catheter was removed, prior to farawave insertion, the physician scanned for an effusion check with ice.The physician noted a greater than 2cm effusion, and instructed staff to prep for pericardiocentesis.More than 1000ml of fluid was removed.At that time, a cardiothoracic (ct) surgeon was called, and the patient was brought to the operating room (or) for further surgical intervention.The farapulse procedure was cancelled, and the patient was admitted to the hospital beyond standard of care.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
It was indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation.If there is any further relevant information obtained, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information was provided in section b5 describe event or problem and section h6 device codes.It was indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation.If there is any further relevant information obtained, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a farapulse procedure to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a fib), a versacross access solutions kit, non-boston scientific diagnostic catheter, non-boston scientific sheath, and farawave catheter were selected for use.It was reported that during the procedure, the physician utilized intracardiac echocardiography (ice) to see the presence of a trace pericardial effusion prior to performing the transseptal puncture (tsp).The physician then performed an ice guided tsp with a versacross access solutions kit.No change in effusion noted.The heart was mapped with a non-boston scientific diagnostic catheter, and the physician noted left superior pulmonary vein (lspv) and left atrial appendage (laa) were extremely close.As soon as the non-boston scientific diagnostic catheter was removed, prior to farawave insertion, the physician scanned for an effusion check with ice.The physician noted a greater than 2cm effusion, and instructed staff to prep for pericardiocentesis.More than 1000ml of fluid was removed.At that time, a cardiothoracic (ct) surgeon was called, and the patient was brought to the operating room (or) for further surgical intervention.The farapulse procedure was cancelled, and the patient was admitted to the hospital beyond standard of care.It was further reported that the tsp was straight forward, located on the anterior middle of the septum, and completed with great tenting visualization on ice.After energization, the rf wire was observed on ice and fluoroscopy going into the lspv.The perforation was on the laa, located superiorly and posteriorly.The patient was taken to the or for a pericardial window and ligature of the laa.The patient has since been discharged from the hospital.The physician believes the cause of the perforation was the non-boston scientific sheath.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a farapulse procedure to treat paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (a fib), a versacross access solutions kit, non-boston scientific diagnostic catheter, non-boston scientific sheath, and farawave catheter were selected for use.It was reported that during the procedure, the physician utilized intracardiac echocardiography (ice) to see the presence of a trace pericardial effusion prior to performing the transseptal puncture (tsp).The physician then performed an ice guided tsp with a versacross access solutions kit.No change in effusion noted.The heart was mapped with a non-boston scientific diagnostic catheter, and the physician noted left superior pulmonary vein (lspv) and left atrial appendage (laa) were extremely close.As soon as the non-boston scientific diagnostic catheter was removed, prior to farawave insertion, the physician scanned for an effusion check with ice.The physician noted a greater than 2cm effusion, and instructed staff to prep for pericardiocentesis.More than 1000ml of fluid was removed.At that time, a cardiothoracic (ct) surgeon was called, and the patient was brought to the operating room (or) for further surgical intervention.The farapulse procedure was cancelled, and the patient was admitted to the hospital beyond standard of care.It was further reported that the tsp was straight forward, located on the anterior middle of the septum, and completed with great tenting visualization on ice.After energization, the rf wire was observed on ice and fluoroscopy going into the lspv.The perforation was on the laa, located superiorly and posteriorly.The patient was taken to the or for a pericardial window and ligature of the laa.The patient has since been discharged from the hospital.The physician believes the cause of the perforation was the non-boston scientific sheath.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Correction to the initial mdr in block(s) d2a common device name and d2b pro code in section d.Suspect medical device and g4 premarket / 510(k) # in section g.All manufacturers.Investigation summary:
based on the available information, although the product was disposed of and could not be returned, we have determined that the pericardial effusion and cardiac perforation is a known inherent risk of use of this device.A technical analysis could not be performed.Device history record review:
it was confirmed this device met specification prior to distribution and there were no manufacturing deviations which could have contributed to the reported event.Labeling review:
based on the information provided, there is no evidence that the device was used in a manner inconsistent with the labelled indications/instructions for use.Risk review:
a risk review was completed and confirmed that the events of pericardial effusion, cardiac perforation and additional intervention required were defined in the risk documentation.This event types have been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Investigation conclusion:
based on the information provided, the reported events of pericardial effusion and cardiac perforation are a known inherent risk of the versacross access solution device.Pericardial effusion, cardiac trauma and additional intervention required are expected procedural complications addressed within the ifu for the versacross access solution device.There were no allegations of a quality or manufacturing deficiency leading to the adverse event as reported to bsc, and the device has not been returned for analysis at this time.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|