| Model Number |
4592 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
High impedance (1291); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Foreign Body In Patient (2687); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
02/24/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the proximal end of this left ventricular (lv) lead was surgically abandoned due to lead breakage during explant attempt.The extracted half of this lv lead was disposed.A new brady lead with a different model was placed in left bundle branch area.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the proximal end of this left ventricular (lv) lead was surgically abandoned due to lead breakage during explant attempt.The extracted half of this lv lead was disposed.A new brady lead with a different model was placed in left bundle branch area.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information indicated that the proximal end of this lv lead was extracted and disposed.This lv lead exhibited a single impedance measurement of more than 2000 ohms.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted to correct the device codes and patient codes fields (h6) in section h, device manufacturers only.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the proximal end of this left ventricular (lv) lead was surgically abandoned due to lead breakage during explant attempt.The extracted half of this lv lead was disposed.A new brady lead with a different model was placed in left bundle branch area.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information indicated that the proximal end of this lv lead was extracted and disposed.This lv lead exhibited a single impedance measurement of more than 2000 ohms.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the proximal end of this left ventricular (lv) lead was surgically abandoned due to lead breakage during explant attempt.The extracted half of this lv lead was disposed.A new brady lead with a different model was placed in left bundle branch area.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information indicated that the proximal end of this lv lead was extracted and disposed.This lv lead exhibited a single impedance measurement of more than 2000 ohms.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance to labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.Based on a thorough review of the reported complaint, boston scientific has assigned an investigation conclusion code of known inherent risk of device because the primary reported observation is addressed in product labeling.Since the reported issues are covered by the instructions for use, it can be concluded that expected or well-understood factors most probably contributed to the event.This report is being submitted to correct the device codes and patient codes fields (h6) in section h, device manufacturers only.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|