• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN SONICISION; INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN SONICISION; INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number SCDA39
Medical Device Problem Codes Failure to Fire (2610); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 10/16/2025
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
D10 concomitant product: scgaa, reusable generator a scgaa (serial # (b)(6)); scda39, ultrason dissect scda39 curved jaw 39cm (lot # 41910194x).Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that about 20 minutes during a procedure, there were issues with the dissector and generator, including frequent red light indicators and the device cannot be used normally.There were no detached parts noted.After replacement of the blade, the same issue persisted.The problem was resolved after replacing both the blade and the generator, and normal function was restored.There was no patient injury.Medtronic's initial evaluation of the incident device found that the spring and mandrel cap had disengaged from one of the dissectors and were not returned.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: b5, g3 medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that about 20 minutes during a procedure, there were issues with the dissector and generator, including frequent red light indicators and the device cannot be used normally.There were no detached part noted.After replacement of the blade, the same issue persisted.The problem was resolved after replacing both the blade and the generator, and normal function was restored.Nothing fell on patient's cavity and there were no interventions performed due to the issue.There was no patient injury.Medtronic's initial evaluation of the incident device found that the spring and mandrel cap had disengaged from one of the dissectors and were not returned.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: g3, h3, h6 h3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection noted that the spring and mandrel cap had disengaged from the device and were not returned.Damages were observed at the generator horn interface.It was reported that there was no activation during procedure.The reported issue was confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SONICISION
Common Device Name
INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
6044 longbow court
boulder CO 80301 3299
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
6044 longbow court
boulder CO 80301 3299
Manufacturer Contact
mike bocchino
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112-4391
8006464633
MDR Report Key24604364
Report Number1717344-2026-00369
Device Sequence Number16045277
Product Code LFL
UDI-Device Identifier10884521592841
UDI-Public(01)10884521592841(17)290708(10)41910194X
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCH
PMA/510(K) Number
K180149
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 06/11/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberSCDA39
Device Catalogue NumberSCDA39
Device Lot Number41910194X
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/25/2026
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/04/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer03/12/2026
06/03/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/16/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date03/26/2026
06/11/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/09/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Concomitant Medical Products
and Therapy/Usage Dates
PLEASE SEE NOTE ON H11
Patient Age49 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight88 KG
-
-