|
Siemens filed mdr 1219913-2026-00056 initial report on 17-mar-2026.Additional information: siemens investigated a customer complaint for a questionable atellica im tsh3-ultra ii (tsh3ulii) lot 013 result on one patient sample.To investigate, siemens reviewed the event details and identified the following: - the initial complaint information indicated that an atellica im tsh3ulii patient sample result was falsely depressed (0.002 mu/l) relative to an alternate method result (11.50 mu/l).- the initial atellica im tsh3ulii result (believed to be incorrect at the time the complaint was submitted) falls within the hyperthyroid range.- the alternate method result (believed to be correct at the time the complaint was submitted) falls within the hypothyroid range.- a valid calibration was obtained on tsh3ulii lot 013, and quality control (qc) were within acceptable ranges on the day that the sample was tested, indicating reagent lot and system were functioning properly.- the patient was taking thybon 20 medication.No other clinical information was provided for this patient.- the customer provided details regarding alternate method tsh assay testing that was performed and the following results were provided: tsh (alternate method 1): 11.50 mu/l - initially considered correct tsh (alternate method 2) < 0.05 mu/l tsh (alternate method 3) < 0.01 mu/l - the alternate method 2 and 3 and the siemens atellica im tsh3ulii results were in agreement (low), while the alternate method 1 result was the outlier (high).After the complaint was initially submitted, siemens received confirmation from the customer that their lab director accepted the atellica im tsh3ulii result as correct and that alternate method 1 result is a discordant result, confirmed by alternate method 2 and 3 results.Based on the available information, siemens' investigation concluded that a device malfunction did not occur.The problem was resolved for the customer when the lab director reviewed the circumstances of the event and accepted the atellica im tsh3ulii result as correct for this patient.In section h1/h2 of this report, the type of reportable event has been updated to indicate that no malfunction occurred.In section h6 of this report, the medical device problem, investigation finding and conclusion codes were updated based on the investigation results.
|