|
Batch review performed on 24 feb 2026 lot 2531819: (b)(4) items manufactured and released on 18 dec 2025.Expiration date: 2030-dec-01.No anomalies found related to the problem.To date, (b)(4) items of the same lot have been sold with no similar reported event during the period of review.Considering the semifinished lot of the device involved in this complaint, (b)(4) items were manufactured and released 23 july 2025.To date, two similar events have been reported on the same semifinished lot during the period of review.Clinical evaluation during drilling of the central hole for the baseplate component, the kwire fractured.It was not possible to remove the broken fragment, so the surgeon left it in the patient.Since the evaluation was performed in only one projection, a complete assessment cannot be made from this single view.In any case, it appears reasonable to assume that both the fragments and the kwire remain inside the bone.The instrument is made of surgical-grade stainless steel, but it is not approved for long term implantation.Therefore, secondary adverse events cannot be completely excluded.Nevertheless, it is understandable that attempting to retrieve the fragment would have been demanding.R&d analysis the k-wire appears to be approximately 4-5 cm shorter than its original length due to the fracture that occurred.The broken end is bent out of alignment with the axis of the instrument.In addition, it is clearly visible that the segment at the fracture point has undergone torsion and crushing.At the broken end, the piece also shows a notched surface with small circular marks, likely related to the use of the central peg reamer, which marked the outer surface during use.There is also a polished surface, presumably also caused by contact with the central peg reamer during use.In order to better analyse what happened, a functional test has been carried out to replicate what likely occurred during the surgical procedure; however, it was possible to reproduce a similar effect for the first described surface, but not for the second.Root cause:based on the available information, no definitive root cause can be identified.The device history record review did not reveal any manufacturing-related issues.The breakage is most likely attributable to intraoperative factors (e.G., bone quality, drilling angle, bending/redirection, axial or torsional forces, surgical handling).There is no objective evidence of a manufacturing, material, or design defect.However, the information available is insufficient to conclusively confirm or exclude any specific cause.
|