|
ETHICON INC. SFX SPI PDS+ BI VIO 12IN2 USP1 D/A CT-1; SUTURE, SURGICAL, ABSORBABLE, POLYDIOXANONE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Catalog Number |
SXPP2B403 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Positioning Failure (1158); Material Integrity Problem (2978)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803, part 4 subpart b.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot, and no non-conformances were identified.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested, and the following was obtained via: the orthopedic said that this suture and a lot of them in the same lot number it wouldn't cut deep enough.When they ran their fingers through the suture, it was really smooth.But when they actually were using it on patients in multiple cases, the barbs weren't catching at all and they were all loose.So, they removed the stratafix and used a quill to answer the question how this was checked out.-the sales rep can't provide specific dates of these how multiple times this happened.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.¿ did this issue contribute to any patient adverse event? it was reported that ".They removed the stratafix." was the suture removed during the procedure? - was the suture trimmed in physician¿s office? - was the suture removed in a routine post-op procedure? - was the suture removed in a reoperation procedure? - what is the most current patient status? ¿ how many devices demonstrated the alleged deficiency? ¿ did the event occur during one or multiple patient procedures? ¿ what is the total number of procedures? ¿ how many devices demonstrated the alleged deficiency iin each procedure? ¿ have any of these events been previously reported to ethicon? if so, could you please provide the corresponding reference number(s)? ¿ please provide the source or name and title of external person providing answers to follow-up (external person submitting answers to sales rep) ¿ please perform and document the follow up attempt for product return.Please provide tracking number.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an unknown procedure in 2026 and barbed suture was used.During the procedure, it was reported to the sales rep that during an unknown procedure the stratafix device, the barbs did not appear to cut deep enough and were not engaging the tissue as expected.The hospital reports that they use stratafix frequently and are familiar with its performance.While suturing, the barbs were grabbing inconsistently.A second device was opened, but staff noted that the stratafix on this unit felt different, as if the barbs were not fully formed or were not engaging properly.Device is returning for return.No adverse patient consequences were reported.Additional information was requested.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|