• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN SONICISION; INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN SONICISION; INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number SCD7A39
Medical Device Problem Codes Device Difficult to Setup or Prepare (1487); Failure to Fire (2610); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 02/06/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during procedure, there was a slight discomfort when connecting and the device was used as is but after about 2 hours red light turned on and it could not be used.The battery was replaced but the issue was not resolved.The dissector and generator was attempted to be detached from each other but they could not be detached.Another device was taken out and used.A distributor's representative used tools to detach the dissector and generator.Afterwards the generator was connected to another dissector and could be used without issues.The dissector did not come into contact with any metal instrument.Another dissector was used with the same generator and battery and worked fine.The connection part between the dissector and generator broke.It was completely removed and did not fall into the patient's cavity.There was no patient harm/injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information: g3, h3, h6 h3 evaluation summary: medtronic conducted an investigation based upon all information received.The device was available for evaluation.Visual inspection found particulate matter in the body of the device.The waveguide was damaged.The torque adaptor had melted.The remnants of the torque adaptor were scattered in the handle body.Further examination of the torque adaptor and interfacing components, the damage appears to be from heat, likely friction.It was reported that the component disengaged, the device was difficult to assemble, the device was difficult to disassemble, and there was no activation during the procedure.The reported issues were confirmed.The most likely cause could not be established from the information available.This issue can occur due to inadequate torquing during assembly, the component geometry or positioning on the waveguide being out of specification, or assembly positioning and tolerance variations causing the torque adaptor to bias against the proximal wall of the inner torque nozzle during use, thereby increasing friction.The evaluation detected an unreported condition: waveguide damage.The product analysis noted evidence that the device was not used as intended.The manufacturing records for each device are thoroughly reviewed prior to release to ensure that it meets all medtronic quality specifications.A secondary review of the device history records found no potentially contributing factors.The instructions included with this device provide the following guidance: contact between the active blade and other metal objects (hemostats, clips, staples, retractors, etc.) may result in product damage, such as a broken blade.Pieces of a broken blade may fall into the surgical cavity causing unintended tissue damage.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SONICISION
Common Device Name
INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
6044 longbow court
boulder CO 80301 3299
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
6044 longbow court
boulder CO 80301 3299
Manufacturer Contact
mike bocchino
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112-4391
8006464633
MDR Report Key24629159
Report Number1717344-2026-00399
Device Sequence Number15602584
Product Code LFL
UDI-Device Identifier10884521794795
UDI-Public(01)10884521794795(17)300903(10)52460244X(20)02
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K212301
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/13/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model NumberSCD7A39
Device Catalogue NumberSCD7A39
Device Lot Number52460244X
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/09/2026
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/24/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer05/12/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/18/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/13/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/04/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-