| Model Number |
2013 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Uterine Perforation (2121)
|
| Date of Event |
03/11/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
A device history record (dhr) review was conducted for the reported lot/serial number.The device was released meeting all qa specifications.The device involved in this event was not returned for evaluation purposes therefore visual and functional analysis of the product could not be performed.We are unable to confirm a relationship between the device and the issue reported.The information obtained during complaint investigation will be included in our global complaint trending and product surveillance will continue to monitor complaints of this type for adverse trends.If the product is received or additional information is obtained, the investigation will be reopened accordingly per standard operating procedure.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a novasure procedure on (b)(6) 2026, there was a perforation reported.The width went from 4 to 5 cm.The patient is stable and sent home.No additional medical intervention was needed.The patient will be returning in 2 months to complete the novasure procedure.No other information is available.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Device was returned: visual inspection was conducted and there were no signs of physical damage.There were no sharp edges on the device reported.Testing of the controller was conducted and the device passed all the testing.Hence, the failure mode reported could not be replicated.This observation will be monitored and trended.A¿device history record (dhr) review was conducted for the reported lot number.An exception was noticed in the dhr, which was not considered a contributing factor to the event reported.The device was released meeting all qa specifications.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|