• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F; PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1808560
Medical Device Problem Code Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 08/28/2024
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
A patient underwent a port placement procedure using the powerport m.R.I.Isp.On (b)(6) 2024, there was a kink right at the junction of the transition at the mediport tubing transition from the neck into the internal jugular.New mediport tubing was placed, keeping the base hub in place, but now rewiring this through the right subclavian.Then examined the catheter and could see that there was a distinct kink there right in the location of the neck as this came up from the mediport base up towards the right ij and then swept down to the superior vena cava.This had an abnormal appearance, as any other bend in the catheter would create a gentle bow, but in this particular location it kinked to the tubing.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: as the lot number for the device was provided, a review of the device history records will be performed.The sample was not returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Therefore, the investigation of the reported event is inconclusive.Based upon the available information, the definitive root cause for this event is unknown.The instructions for use (ifu) is adequate for the reported device/patient code(s) and provides general instructions for use, as well as warnings, precautions and potential complications associated with the device.Upon receipt of new or additional information, a follow up report will be submitted as applicable.Section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant/reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
H11: manufacturing review: the device history records have been reviewed, and this lot met all release criteria.Investigation summary: the physical device was not returned for evaluation.No photos were provided for review.The investigation is inconclusive for the reported catheter kink issue as no objective evidence was provided for review.The definitive root cause could not be determined based upon available information.Labeling review: as the reported event did not allege a labeling or use related issue, a labeling review is not required.D4 (unique identifier (udi) #), e4, g3, h6 (method).Section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
A patient underwent a port placement procedure using the powerport m.R.I.Isp.On (b)(6) 2024, there was a kink right at the junction of the transition at the mediport tubing transition from the neck into the internal jugular.New mediport tubing was placed, keeping the base hub in place, but now rewiring this through the right subclavian.Then examined the catheter and could see that there was a distinct kink there right in the location of the neck as this came up from the mediport base up towards the right ij and then swept down to the superior vena cava.This had an abnormal appearance, as any other bend in the catheter would create a gentle bow, but in this particular location it kinked to the tubing.There was no reported patient injury.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWERPORT ISP M.R.I. IMPLANTABLE PORT, GROSHONG SINGLE-LUMEN, 8F
Common Device Name
PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
brett curtice
800 w. rio salado pkwy
tempe, AZ 85281
4803032689
MDR Report Key24636260
Report Number3006260740-2026-01746
Device Sequence Number8698321
Product Code LJT
UDI-Device Identifier00801741027116
UDI-Public(01)00801741027116(11)240222(17)260430(10)REJN0045
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateAL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K063377
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,User Facility
Initial Reporter Occupation Risk Manager
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/17/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2026
Device Catalogue Number1808560
Device Lot NumberREJN0045
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 02/26/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/17/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/19/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/22/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured02/22/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age76 YR
Patient SexMale
Patient Weight78 KG
Patient RaceWhite
-
-