• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. HARMONIC SCALPEL 5MM HD SHEATH HOOK TIP; INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. HARMONIC SCALPEL 5MM HD SHEATH HOOK TIP; INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number HDH05
Medical Device Problem Code Material Integrity Problem (2978)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 01/26/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 3/19/2026.D4 batch #: a97043.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: ·it was mentioned that "the blade was broken and retrieved." but it is correct in understanding that the broken pieces of the blade fell off inside the patient's body and were all removed? -the doctor commented again that the doctor felt something wrong and the device was removed from the patient's body when the device was used.The tip was broken when the device was operated outside the surgical field.·please tell us how the broken pieces were removed from the patient's body.(for example, the broken pieces were retrieved with forceps under laparoscopy?).-because the damage occurred outside the patient's body, there is no procedure to remove it.·was there any bleeding or tissue damage when this event occurred? (please also let us know if any additional treatment was required.) -no, there was no bleeding or tissue damage.·will the broken pieces be sent with the returned device? -the broken pieces will be sent.Were any fragments generated? -no.The blade was not broken off, it was deformed.Did the fragments generated fell off inside the patient? - no if yes, were they completely removed from the patient without additional intervention? - na what efforts were made to locate the pieces of the blade during the procedure? - na.Investigation summary: the product was returned for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample determined that the device was returned with the distal tip of the blade broken off and it was returned with the device.The remaining blade portion was scratched and with evidence of contact with metal in or out of the operative field.During functional testing on gen11, an alert screen was displayed.A probable cause for the device to stop activating and the energy system to display an alert screen is blade damage.The device was disassembled to verify the condition of the internal components and no anomalies were found.Probable causes of blade damage, including breakage, are external contact during pre-op or general use, blade contact with other devices, staples, or clips during the procedure, or using any means other than the blade wrench to attach or detach the blade.Once minor blade damage has occurred, subsequent activations may increase the severity of the blade damage.This in turn can result in activation issues such as failing the pre-run test with the generator and displaying an alert screen.These alert screens that can result are such as ¿tighten assembly¿, ¿blade error detected¿ or "relaxed pressure on blade" followed by a ¿replace instrument¿ screen later in the procedure.Continued usage of the damaged blade can result in a broken blade.As part of the quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch a97043, and no non-conformances were identified.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that, during an unknown ob-gyn surgery, the tip was broken.Another device was used to complete the case.There were no adverse consequences to the patient.No further information is available.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HARMONIC SCALPEL 5MM HD SHEATH HOOK TIP
Common Device Name
INSTRUMENT, ULTRASONIC SURGICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
*  00969
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
*   00969
Manufacturer Contact
orla o'mahony
475 calle c
guaynabo 
*  
3035526892
MDR Report Key24643050
Report Number3005075853-2026-02105
Device Sequence Number16004228
Product Code LFL
UDI-Device Identifier10705036002109
UDI-Public(01)10705036002109(17)291031(10)A97043
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryJA
PMA/510(K) Number
K990362
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 03/19/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberHDH05
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/10/2026
Type of Report(Section G)Initial
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/17/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/19/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/21/2024
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexUnknown
-
-