| Model Number |
30-103 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Entrapment of Device (1212); Material Separation (1562)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Vascular Dissection (3160)
|
| Date of Event |
02/12/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted to supplement an initial mdr mailed on 3/13/2026 due to a temporary system outage affecting the manufacturer's complaint handling system.Although this report is being submitted as an initial report due to system limitations, it is intended as a follow-up report to the previously submitted paper mdr (b)(4).The device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.Upon completion of the investigation, a follow-up report will be submitted.Manufacturers reference number (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2026 a patient underwent arterial thrombectomy using stryker peripheral vascular devices.At the end of the thrombectomy, the artix thin-walled sheath encountered resistance when attempting to remove the sheath.As the physician pulled the sheath, the sheath unraveled.An arterial cutdown was performed to remove the sheath.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
On (b)(6) 2026, a patient underwent arterial thrombectomy using stryker peripheral vascular devices.At the end of the thrombectomy, the artix thin-walled sheath encountered resistance when attempting to remove the sheath.As the physician pulled the sheath, the sheath unraveled.An arterial cutdown was performed to remove the sheath.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device malfunctioned, which resulted in the need for medical intervention in the form of a venous cutdown.The suspect device was returned and evaluated.The root cause of the catheter separation was most likely due to procedural factors such as excessive manipulation during the procedure.Excessive force used to advance or retract the device against resistance can cause damage to the catheter.Per device labelling: "do not advance without dilator fully inserted.Avoid using excessive force to advance or retract against resistance." the device identifiers were provided, and the lot history records were reviewed.There were no discrepancies or unusual findings.Additionally, a complaint history review was conducted and no similar issues have been reported against this lot number.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|