| Model Number |
9-PFO-2518 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Low Blood Pressure/ Hypotension (1914); Cardiac Tamponade (2226); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
|
| Date of Event |
02/25/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2026, a 25-18mm amplatzer talisman pfo occluder was chosen for implant using a 9f amplatzer trevisio sheath during a pfo case.The physician first crossed the septum with a j-wire followed by a multipurpose catheter, and then exchanged this for a stiff non-abbott exchange wire.The physician advanced the 9f trevisio sheath across the septum into the left atrium, after which a 25 mm talisman pfo device was prepared and advanced through the sheath.The left disc was deployed; however, visualization of the disc in the left atrium on tee was difficult.Shortly thereafter, the patient¿s blood pressure decreased from 120/60 to 65/45.A tee assessment revealed a developing pericardial effusion, prompting the physician to perform a pericardiocentesis, during which approximately one liter of fluid was removed and the patient¿s blood pressure subsequently normalized.The physician then re-crossed the septum and deployed the device.It was believed that the exchange wire may have entered the left atrium and contributed to the effusion.The patient was initially stable post-procedure and left the room; however, after time in the pacu, the patient was transferred to the operating room for surgical repair of the effusion.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The device is not returning for evaluation.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that on (b)(6) 2026, a 25-18mm amplatzer talisman pfo occluder was chosen for implant using a 9f amplatzer trevisio sheath during a pfo case.A minor pericardial effusion was noted prior to the start of the procedure.The patient was in sinus rhythm, and heparin was administered with activated clotting time reported to be greater than 250 seconds.The physician crossed the septum with a j-wire followed by a multipurpose catheter, which was then exchanged for a stiff non-abbott exchange wire positioned in the upper pulmonary vein, with no multiple wire or delivery sheath exchanges reported.The 9f trevisio sheath was advanced across the septum into the left atrium, and a 25¿mm talisman pfo device was prepared and advanced through the sheath.Deployment of the left atrial disc was initiated; however, visualization of the disc in the left atrium on tee was difficult.Shortly thereafter, the patient¿s blood pressure decreased from 120/60 to 65/45.A tee assessment revealed a circumferential pericardial effusion, and the physician concluded that cardiac tamponade was present.Pericardiocentesis was performed, during which approximately one liter of fluid was removed, resulting in normalization of the patient¿s blood pressure.The physician subsequently re-crossed the septum and deployed the device, which was not explanted.It was reported that the exchange wire may have entered the left atrium and contributed to the effusion; however, the user did not believe an abbott device caused the pericardial effusion, and the suspected cause was otherwise unknown.The patient was initially stable post-procedure and left the room; however, after time in the pacu, the patient was transferred to the operating room, where open heart surgery was performed in addition to the prior pericardiocentesis to address the pericardial effusion.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
An event of pericardial effusion led to cardiac tamponade was reported.A returned device assessment could not be performed as the device remains implanted and was not returned for analysis.The device history record was reviewed to ensure that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed, and the product met all specifications.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.Information from field indicated that the cause of the pericardial effusion was unknown, but likely due to the exchange wire may have entered the left atrium and contributed to the effusion causing a perforation.The reported surgical intervention and unexpected medical intervention were a result of case-specific circumstances as pericardiocentesis was performed and a open heart surgery was performed.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to labeling design or manufacturing of the device.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|