| Catalog Number |
DWJ001 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Osseointegration Problem (3003)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Inadequate Osseointegration (2646)
|
| Date of Event |
02/01/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, the patient had orif proximal humerus converted to an augmented rsa, the aseptic loosening contributed by suboptimal seating of the baseplate, bone quality was good.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported event could not be confirmed since the device was not returned for evaluation, and no other evidence was provided to confirm the alleged issue.A device inspection was not possible since the affected device was not returned for investigation.A review of the device history for the reported lot did not indicate any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.No indications of material manufacturing or design related problems were found during the investigation.A review of the labelling did not indicate any abnormalities.More detailed information about the complaint event must be available in order to determine the root cause of the complaint event.If any further information is provided the complaint report will be updated.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that, the patient had orif proximal humerus converted to an augmented rsa, the aseptic loosening contributed by suboptimal seating of the baseplate, bone quality was good.No further information was provided.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The reported event could not be confirmed based on the medical expert opinion on the available radiographs.The device inspection was not possible as the product was not returned for investigation.A formal medical opinion was sought, which concluded
a definitive opinion could not be sought because the single low resolution image does not adequately show the implant¿bone interface of the subject component on the glenoid side.The device history record could not be reviewed because the affected device was not returned, and the lot number was not communicated.Indications of material, manufacturing, or design related problems were unable to be identified as the catalog number and lot number were not communicated.A review of the labelling did not indicate any abnormalities.Based on the available information, a definitive root cause cannot be established.If device is returned or any further information is provided, the investigation report will be reassessed.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|