| Catalog Number |
620510105 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Break (1069); Crack (1135)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/05/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Malfunction
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If the information is unknown, not available or does not apply, the section/field of the form is left blank.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D4: udi: as the lot number for the device involved in the event was not provided, the full udi is currently not available.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the plastic portion at the end of the small glenoid reamer cracked on two sides and pieces fell off when the technician inserted the reamer tip.All available information has been disclosed.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #(b)(4).Investigation summary: an analysis of the product could not be performed since a physical sample was not received for evaluation.An evaluation of the manufacturing record could not be performed as the required product identification number was not provided to complete the evaluation.As part of our company quality system process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and distributed to approved specifications.Based on the information available, there is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition, therefore it has been determined that no corrective and preventive action is required at this time.Additional complaint information monitoring for potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending as part of the post-market surveillance.However, if the product is received at a later date, the investigation will be updated as applicable.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: according to the information provided: "it was reported that the end of the reamer cracked on 2 sides and pieces fell of when tech inserted the small glenoid reamer tip.The plastic portion".The product was returned to depuy synthes for evaluation.Visual inspection of the returned device found signs of heavy usage on its overall surface, and two of the sleeve tabs were found broken.Broken fragments were not returned for evaluation.The damage reported in this complaint is consistent with the failure mode investigated during a series review of additional complaints involving similar drivers of the same product code (620510105).The observed condition of the device was consistent with a random component failure that may have been caused by exposure to unintended forces such as loaded in reverse bending beyond the material limit resulting in crack initiation and propagation.As per inhance¿ shoulder system surgical technique rev.C, page 13, the following precautions need to be followed: "to assemble the humeral reamer to the driver, insert the drive end of the humeral reamer into the driver and rotate the humeral reamer until the flats on the humeral reamer and driver align.Once aligned, the driver retaining feature will snap into the groove on the reamer.When snapped into place, the laser line on the reamer should not be visible.If the laser line is visible, continue rotating the humeral reamer until the flats of the humeral reamer and driver align and the humeral reamer snaps into place".Properly handling and¿attention to the approved use of the device diminishes the risk of failure.A dimensional inspection was unable to be performed due to the post-manufacturing damage.A functional test was unable to be performed due to the post-manufacturing damage.The overall complaint was confirmed as the observed condition of the driver would have contributed to the complained device issue.Based on the investigation findings, it has been determined that no corrective and/or preventative action is proposed.There is no indication that a design or manufacturing issue has caused the reported complaint condition.As part of depuy synthes quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Additional monitoring for any potential safety signals will be conducted through complaint trending and other post-market safety surveillance activities.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.Corrected: h3.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Product complaint #(b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees hat the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H11 additional narrative: added: d4 lot, d9, h4.Corrected: d4 primary udi#.The device was received, the investigation is in progress, no conclusion could be drawn at the time of filing this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|