|
The revision reported was likely the result of wear of the tibial insert and suspected aseptic (non-infected) loosening.The cause and extent of the prosthesis wear cannot be determined because the revised components were not returned for evaluation and no x-rays or photographs were provided.If any further information is obtained that would change or alter any information provided, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.D10: tray, tibia trapezoid cementedsize3f/3t, cat# 204-04-33, sn (b)(6).Insert, constrained condylar size3 9mm, cat# 208-23-09, sn (b)(6).Patella, three peg 35mm, cat# 200-02-35, sn (b)(6).Extension, femoral andtibialflutedstem 12mm od x11mm l, cat# 204-32-01, sn (b)(6).Component, femur non¿modular cck size 3, cat#210-01-03, sn (b)(6).
|
|
It was reported that the patient underwent an initial right total knee arthroplasty.Subsequently, it was reported that the patient experienced pain, swelling, osteolysis and prosthesis wear.As a result, the patient underwent a right knee revision approximately 13 years after initial implantation.Patient was last known to be in stable condition.No further information available.
|