|
Examination of the production records of the involved nail did not reveal any deviation from specification.The explanted nail (nor the case x-rays) was not available to the manufacturer; therefore, nail physical examination was not feasible.Although the nail could not be examined, the fact that it fractured after five months in metastatic bone with non-union suggests a fatigue fracture.Breakage of proximal femur nails is known and documented in the literature, with reported rates that range from 0.2% to 5.6%.The risk of implant failure increases in case of pathological fractures, as in the described case.[1] the company is actively seeking for more data.[1] johnson na et al., risk factors for intramedullary nail breakage in proximal femoral fractures: a 10-year retrospective review.Ann r coll surg engl.2017; 99(2): 145-150.
|
|
On march 16, 2026, the company became aware of a case involving its piccolo composite pf nail.Based on the information provided to the company, the device was implanted in an oncologic patient with femoral metastases on (b)(6) 2024, following a fall resulting in a pathological fracture of the femur.Approximately five months post-implantation, the nail fractured at or near the lag screw interface due to non-union.On (b)(6) 2025, the nail was removed and replaced with a total hip prosthesis.
|