|
The investigation of this complaint has been completed.The anesthesia system was investigated on site by our field service engineer.No fault was found, and no parts were replaced.The logs were analyzed.The logs showed that the system checkouts performed before and after the event were successful.The treatment was started in automatic ventilation.From start, the device triggered alarms for low measured volumes with leakage.Furthermore, the logs contains records of 34 patient cases the following three weeks after the event until it was reported.In case the reported event had been caused by the anesthesia system, this would have resulted in multiple failure in the system checkout which is not the case.The anesthesia system was released for clinical use.No further issues have been reported with the anesthesia system.The device logs were sent for further evaluation.Additional information received from the user facility stated that the patient was an obese patient (114 kg) that was difficult to intubate.The evaluation of the received device logs shows that the system checkout performed prior to and after the event were successful.The technical log has no entries during this date, which indicates the absence of technical malfunctions in the system at the time of the event.The treatment was started in manual ventilation in adult patient category.Shortly after start of the treatment, the system was set to automatic ventilation in pressure support mode.The pressure level above peep was set to 5 cmh2o, backup pc level above peep set to 10 cmh2o, peep set to 3 cmh2o and ps backup frequency set to 4 b/min.Alarms for leakage, expiratory minute volume low and etco2 low were immediately generated in pressure support.The pressure level above peep was decreased to 4 cmh2o and alarms continued to be generated.The leakage alarm audio was set to off.After two minutes in pressure support ventilation the system switched to backup ventilation and thereafter the user set the system to manual ventilation.The apl was set to sp.With the apl set to sp, the manual breathing bag fills slowly up to 2 cmh2o apl pressure and the patient can breathe spontaneously.The user set the system to pressure support again with same setting as before and same alarms were generated again.Some quick ventilation mode changes were performed, and the system was finally set to manual ventilation and the o2 flush was pressed several times.After about 20 minutes of manual ventilation, the logs indicate that the patient had been disconnected and soon after the system was set to standby.The evaluation of the logs confirms issues during the treatment.The logs show that the set pressure parameters were low.With these set pressure parameters, the delivered volume will most probably be low.There is nothing in the logs to indicate that the issues during the treatment were caused by a system malfunction.The system tried to deliver flow and pressure according to settings and detected and generated alarms for the current situation.Our conclusion, based on the field service engineer investigation and the log evaluation, is that there was no system malfunction at the time of the event.
|