| Model Number |
PVF-L |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Deformation Due to Compressive Stress (2889)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
|
| Date of Event |
02/11/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The manufacturer was notified of an intraoperative explant involving a perceval plus valve.The following provides a summary of all information currently available to the manufacturer from the facility.On (b)(6) 2026, a perceval plus valve pvf-l was implanted and the aorta was closed.Due to echo results, the aorta was re-opened and it was observed that the perceval valve was not expanded properly.Consequently, the valve was explanted and replaced with a medtronic hancock ii 25 mm valve.The original valve was subsequently disposed of by the site.No additional details regarding the event, patient outcome, or diagnostic images demonstrating the reported infolding are available at this time.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
The manufacturing and material records for the device involved in this event, as they pertain to the reported issue, were retrieved and reviewed by the manufacturer¿s quality engineering.The results confirmed that this prosthesis satisfied all required material, visual, and performance standards at the time of manufacture and release.The manufacturer will submit a follow-up report upon availability of new details from the healthcare facility.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
The manufacturer was notified of the intraoperative explant a perceval plus valve size l.The following provides a summary of all information currently available to the manufacturer.On 11 february 2026, avr was performed through full sternotomy on a patient with a tricuspid stenotic valve with no abnormal geometries of the annulus, which measured 24 mm on intraop tee.Cabg was performed as concomitant procedure.The perceval plus valve (pvf-l) was implanted, and the aorta was subsequently closed.However, postoperative echocardiographic findings revealed a paravalvular leak (pvl), prompting reopening of the aorta.Intraoperative assessment suggested that the perceval valve may not have fully expanded on the non-coronary side.An additional balloon dilatation at 2.5 bar was performed; however, the valve was ultimately explanted and replaced with a 25 mm medtronic hancock ii valve.The original device was disposed of at the site.The event resulted in an additional 56 minutes of cross-clamp time and 62 minutes of cardiopulmonary bypass time, during which the patient remained stable.The patient is reportedly in good condition and has been discharged from the hospital.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Updated sections: b4, b5, g3, g6, h2, h6, h11.The manufacturing and material records for the device involved in this event, as they pertain to the reported issue, were retrieved and reviewed by the manufacturer¿s quality engineering.The results confirmed that this prosthesis satisfied all required material, visual, and performance standards at the time of manufacture and release.The involved device has not been returned to the manufacturer, therefore an evaluation of the prosthesis cannot be performed.However, the review of the manufacturing records did not highlight any device deficiency.Based on the available information, the most plausible cause of the reported event is an unintended initial malpositioning of the device or improper balloon inflation.In fact, the perceval instructions for use (ifu) specify that ballooning should be performed at 4 atm.However, no diagnostic images confirming the suspected valve folding have been provided to the manufacturer and therefore a definite root cause for the reported event cannot be determined.Should any medical imaging or further information regarding the event become available, the manufacturer will reassess the case as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|