|
(b)(4).Date sent: 3/25/2026.B3: exact event date unk, entered 1/1/2026 as only the year was provided.D4: batch # 419d93.Investigation summary: the product was returned to ethicon endo-surgery for evaluation.Visual inspection and functional testing were conducted on the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the glc60 device was received with no apparent damage with the firing knob forward and with a glcr60b reload loaded in the device.The reload was returned fully fired with the swing tab in locked position.The device was tested for functionality with a test reload and it fired, cut, and formed all the staples as intended.The staple line and cut line were complete, and the staples meet the staple form release criteria.The event described could not be confirmed as the device was returned without detectable damage and the device closed as expected.Additionally, a photo was provided and it showed tissue with several b-formed staples on the tissue.As part of ethicon endo surgery¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Device history review: a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number 419d93, and no non-conformances were identified.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: "did the appliance cut the fabric? small intestine.If the appliance cut, was the cut line complete? no.How was the problem resolved? "dubbing" to absorbable suture, photo attached."reinforced with absorbable suture material is the patient's current status known? we don't have any hindsight on the situation.Were there any consequences for the patient or a change in post-operative care as a result of the event? " likewise, we have no follow-up data on the situation.Fistula or another diagnosis? please provide more details about "multiple staples are in the same place".You will find attached a photo that illustrates the problem: "accumulation" of staples on the small intestine: indeed, during stapling several staples were placed in the same place.The first clamp used did not close, the second did a bad stapling.Did the unit lock (no clips extended and no cut lines opened)? no.Or did the device begin to deploy staples and cut but could not finish? no.What was the appearance of the deployed staples (in b-form, malformed, goal post / straight branches): cf photo "folded appearance, as used, but remains on the surface".Were there any missing staples on the staple line (staples missing/not visible on a portion of the line)? : the first part of stapling was complete.Did the appliance cut the fabric? hail.If the appliance cut, was the cut line complete? no.How was the problem resolved? "dubbing" to absorbable suture, photo attached.Is the patient's current status known? we have no hindsight on the situation.Were there any consequences for the patient or a change in post-operative care as a result of the event? similarly, no setback on the situation.Fistula or something else? this report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|