• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV EVOLUT PRO PLUS VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV EVOLUT PRO PLUS VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number EVPROPLUS-26US
Medical Device Problem Codes Calcified (1077); Intravalvular regurgitation (4068)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Calcium Deposits/Calcification (1758); Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
Date of Event 03/19/2026
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that 4 years and 4 months following the implant of a transcatheter aortic valve, central regurgitation of severe severity was identified as well as calcification of the transcatheter aortic valve.Central regurgitation of the patient's mitral valve was additionally identified.Subsequently, a transcatheter aortic valve was implanted valve-in-valve to replace the previously implanted valve.Per the physician, the depth of implant contributed to the event.
 
Event or Problem Description
Additional information was received that the "leak" was the severe regurgitation of the transcatheter aortic valve, and there was no paravalvular leak (pvl).
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Updated data: b5.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Updated data: b5.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that 4 years and 4 months following the implant of a transcatheter aortic valve, central regurgitation of severe severity was identified as well as calcification of the transcatheter aortic valve.Central regurgitation of the patient's mitral valve was additionally identified.Subsequently, a transcatheter aortic valve was implanted valve-in-valve to replace the previously implanted valve.Per the physician, the depth of implant contributed to the event.Additional information was received that the patient was at the facility for the implant of a non-medtronic mitral valve clip and the pre-operative echocardiogram showed a "leak." therefore, it was decided to implant the non-medtronic transcatheter aortic valve.The angiogram showed the deep implant, and the physicians did not know when it occurred.Additionally, the physician's did not believe that the patient's aortic valve regurgitation contributed to the mitral valve regurgitation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUT PRO PLUS VALVE
Common Device Name
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX  22210
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV
av. paseo del cucapah #10510
tijuana,bc 22210
MX   22210
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key24691696
Report Number9617601-2026-02031
Device Sequence Number9706654
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00763000211110
UDI-Public(01)00763000211110(17)220311
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateTX
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P130021
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2021
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)N
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/21/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/11/2022
Device Model NumberEVPROPLUS-26US
Device Catalogue NumberEVPROPLUS-26US
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/19/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/01/2026
05/01/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/25/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/24/2026
05/21/2026
Date Device Manufactured03/28/2020
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight57 KG
-
-