• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750CM26A
Medical Device Problem Code Burst Container or Vessel (1074)
Health Effect - Clinical Code No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Date of Event 03/04/2026
Type of Reportable Event Malfunction
Event or Problem Description
As reported by our field clinical specialist (fcs) during a transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a 26 mm sapien 3 ultra valve the initial catheter was not passing smoothly through the fully expandable portion of the first 14fr esheath+, so it was exchanged for a new 14fr esheath+.Then as they went to deploy the valve the balloon on the 26 mm commander delivery system (ds) ruptured longitudinally and they could not get all 23cc into the valve before the rupture.The ds was removed without issue, and a new ds was prepped and inflated in the deployed valve to fully expand it to nominal volume.The patient remained in stable condition, and the valve was implanted successfully.The perceived root cause of the resistance was that it was believed the expandable portion was against the greater curvature in a bend in the vessel.The perceived root cause of the ballon burst is annular/lvot calcium nodule.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is ongoing.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
A supplemental mdr is being submitted due to engineering evaluation findings.Sections g6, h2, h6: type of investigation, investigation findings, investigation conclusions and conclusions in this section have been updated.The event reported is anticipated in the risk management documentation for transcatheter heart valve procedures.A previous investigation into this type of event is captured in an edwards lifesciences technical summary and applies to this complaint.Additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The device was not returned for evaluation.Due to the unavailability of the complaint device, engineering was unable to perform any visual inspection, functional testing, or dimensional analysis.Per the technical summary, the instructions for use (ifu), training manuals and current risk mitigations have been reviewed.No inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Imaging was provided and reviewed, the ct showed calcification present within the landing zone.Through extensive complaint investigations, balloon burst events during valve deployment have not been associated with device malfunctions or manufacturing nonconformances.Rather, the root cause for these events has historically been due to calcification in the landing zone or over-inflation of the balloon.The complaint for balloon burst has been confirmed based on the information available to date and review of provided imagery.Any updates or additional findings will be submitted in accordance with fda reporting requirements.Available information suggests that patient factors (calcification) likely contributed to the event.Review of provided imagery revealed presence of calcification within the landing zone.The presence of calcification can create a challenging anatomy for balloon inflation.While the balloons are sufficiently designed and tested to ensure the burst pressure is at or above the rated burst pressure, calcified nodules can compromise the structure of the balloon wall via following mechanisms such as puncture, local overstretching, open cell impingement, or stress concentration.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.Since no edwards product defects or labeling deficiencies were identified, no corrective or preventative action is required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES COMMANDER DELIVERY SYSTEM
Common Device Name
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key24705477
Report Number2015691-2026-13572
Device Sequence Number13305997
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103207835
UDI-Public(01)00690103207835(17)270922(10)67048355
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateMI
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
P140031
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Initial Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 04/23/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Model Number9750CM26A
Device Lot Number67048355
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/04/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/17/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date03/26/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date04/23/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured09/22/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexFemale
-
-