|
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC NEUROMODULATION CORPORATION Linear? 3-4; stimulator, spinal-cord, totally implanted for pain relief
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
SC-2352-50 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Off-Label Use (1494); Unexpected Therapeutic Results (1631)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Bacterial Infection (1735); Fever (1858); Pain (1994); High White Blood Cell Count (4594)
|
| Date of Event |
12/04/2025
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block d.2b; additional applicable product codes: qrb.Additional suspect medical device components involved in the event: model number/catalog number: sc-4316.Batch/lot number: 34205183.Model/catalog description: clik anchor.Unique identifier (udi) #: (b)(4).Model number/catalog number: sc-1232.Serial number: (b)(6).Batch/lot number: 794160.Model/catalog description: wavewriter alpha 32 ipg kit.Unique identifier (udi) #: (b)(4).
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the spinal cord stimulation (scs) patient experienced arm pain at the lead incision site and reduced stimulation coverage.As a result, the patient underwent a lead repositioning procedure.Postoperatively, the patient initially achieved excellent pain coverage.Subsequently, the patient developed fever and an elevated white blood cell count due to an infection at the arm site where the procedure had been performed, and antibiotic therapy was initiated.According to the physicians assessment, the infection was related to the procedure.The patient was admitted to the hospital beyond standard postoperative care, where the entire scs system was explanted, a wound washout was performed, and cultures were obtained.The patient has since fully recovered and has been discharged.The explanted devices will not be returned for analysis, as they were discarded by the medical facility.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that the spinal cord stimulation (scs) patient experienced arm pain at the lead incision site and reduced stimulation coverage.As a result, the patient underwent a lead repositioning procedure.Postoperatively, the patient initially achieved excellent pain coverage.Subsequently, the patient developed fever and an elevated white blood cell count due to an infection at the arm site where the procedure had been performed, and antibiotic therapy was initiated.According to the physicians assessment, the infection was related to the procedure.The patient was admitted to the hospital beyond standard postoperative care, where the entire scs system was explanted, a wound washout was performed, and cultures were obtained.The patient has since fully recovered and has been discharged.The explanted devices will not be returned for analysis, as they were discarded by the medical facility.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Block d.2b; additional applicable product codes: qrb.Additional suspect medical device components involved in the event:
model number/catalog number: sc-4316.Batch/lot number: 34205183.Model/catalog description: clik anchor.Unique identifier (udi) #: (b)(4).Model number/catalog number: sc-1232.Serial number: (b)(6).Batch/lot number: 794160.Model/catalog description: wavewriter alpha 32 ipg kit.Unique identifier (udi) #: (b)(4).The devices have not been returned as they were discarded by the medical facility.As such, physical analysis has not been conducted in our laboratory.However, a labeling review was conducted.A labeling review did not reveal any anomalies and states that possible surgical procedural risks are temporary pain at the implant site, infection, cerebrospinal fluid (csf) leakage and, although rare, epidural hemorrhage, seroma, hematoma and paralysis.Persistent pain at the ipg or lead site and undesirable stimulation may occur over time due to cellular changes in tissue around the electrodes, changes in electrode position, loose electrical connections and/or lead failure, all of which are known risks associated with the use of spinal cord stimulation (scs).Labelling also states the lead implant location is epidural.A review of the manufacturing documentation for the devices revealed that no anomalies or deviations related to the event occurred during manufacturing.The devices were not returned for analysis.However, an assessment of the investigation activities determined that, although the labeling specifies that the lead implant location is epidural and the reported use may have deviated from the intended anatomical application, the physician confirmed that the infection was related to the procedural intervention.Therefore, this investigation is assigned a probable cause of adverse event related to procedure.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|