| Catalog Number |
2000684 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Difficult to Flush (1251); Difficult to Remove (1528)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Thrombosis/Thrombus (4440)
|
| Date of Event |
03/12/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by abiomed inc or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, abiomed inc, or its employees, caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Impella cp 10 was inserted through the 14fr low profile sheath via the femoral artery in a 65 year old female who presented in ami/cgs without incident.The patient¿s comorbidities were unknown.The patient¿s clinical state prior to initiation of support was identified as scai shock stage c.Post procedure in the icu the sheath sidearm was hooked up to a pressure bag with ns and heparin.The following day at 9:30am it was noted that there was miscommunication and the sidearm flush was discontinued.It was reconnected at 10:30am that same day.While on support the device performed as expected p-9 3.5l/min with no noted alarms or concerns.Upon planned removal, after the sheath was removed, during standard aspiration of the sheath it was noted to be "stuck".The sheath was pulled back slightly with some success, however, there was still noted difficulty during aspiration.The syringe was then disconnected and the stopcock was left open, which showed adequate flow.After utilizing new syringe and aspiration, clot was noted.They then utilized a slip tip syringe to aspirate through the valve and clot was noted to have been aspirated from there as well.Second aspiration was found to be clear.The wire was then inserted into the sheath for successful removal of the 14fr low profile sheath.Clot formation in the space between the 14fr low profile sheath and the 9fr impella catheter shaft is a known risk per the ifu.There were no identified adverse events to the patient.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Additional information was received indicating there was difficulty in flushing the introducer.Problem code a150207 has been replaced with a1410.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Corrected information was provided in b2 (is product problem), and d3 (manufacturer fax).Upon review, it was identified that these were inadvertently omitted from the initial report.Corrected information was provided in d4 (catalog).Upon review, the catalog has now been updated.Updated d9 and h3 to ¿yes¿ as the device was received and evaluated.H6: updated codes based on the results of the investigation.H11: updated based on the results of the investigation.A known primary contributing factor of thrombus formation within the 14fr low profile sheath is the gap between the impella catheter and the inner diameter of the indwelling sheath.User-driven mitigation techniques, such as flushing, may reduce the risk of thrombus formation within the gap space.In this case, the sheath was managed with a pressure bag for the majority of the case, but the account had some management challenges regarding protocols for sheath management including a period of some time without a pressure bag to the sidearm.The cause of the thrombus formation can be traced to the device design of a gap between the impella catheter and sheath inner diameter.Specifically in this case, there was also temporary deviation from the sheath management technique, which may have increased the amount of thrombus formation.Upon returned product inspection, a kink was found on the returned sheath causing an uneven surface on the outer and inner wall of the sheath body.The cause of the kink is unknown but cannot be dissociated from thrombus formation.In addition, clinical details note that the physician had difficulty aspirating prior to sheath removal.The cause of the difficulty aspirating the sidearm could not definitively be determined because the issue could not be reproduced with the returned product, but the the presence of thrombus in the sheath was likely a contributing factor per the clinical details.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|