| Model Number |
E321.332 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Joint Dislocation (2374)
|
| Date of Event |
03/20/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
(b)(4) initial report additional information, including post primary and pre revision x-rays, operative notes (primary and revision), patient age, activity level, weight and medical history, whether the patient followed correct post-op protocol, whether the patient experienced any slips / falls or other trauma post primary surgery, what was implanted at the revision, how many dislocations did the patient have prior to the revision, what was the patient doing at the time of the dislocations and an update on the patient post revision, has been requested in order to progress with the investigation of this event, and if received, will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.The appropriate device details have been provided and the relevant device manufacturing records will be identified and reviewed.Please note: this report is filed with the fda due to an adverse event experienced with a device that is similar to those placed on the market in the usa, however, this event occurred outside of the usa.The submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the device, reporting entity, entity's representative or distributor caused or contributed to this event.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Trinity revision of the ecima liner and metal head after approximately 2 years 2 months and 2 weeks due to dislocation.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Per comp - (b)(4) final report.Additional information, including post primary and pre revision x-rays, operative notes (primary and revision), patient age, activity level, weight and medical history, whether the patient followed correct post-op protocol, whether the patient experienced any slips / falls or other trauma post primary surgery, what was implanted at the revision, how many dislocations did the patient have prior to the revision, what was the patient doing at the time of the dislocations and an update on the patient post revision, was requested in order to progress with the investigation of this event, however, none of this information was provided and thus the scope of the investigation was limited.The appropriate device details were provided and the relevant device manufacturing records have been identified and reviewed.All parts associated with these records conformed to material and dimensional specification at the time of manufacture.Based on the available information, no further investigation can be conducted and the root cause of the reported dislocation could not be determined.Therefore, this case is now considered closed, however, should any additional information be provided then this case may be re-opened for further investigation.Please note: this report is filed with the fda due to an adverse event experienced with a device that is similar to those placed on the market in the usa, however, this event occurred outside of the usa.The submission of this report does not constitute an admission that the device, reporting entity, entity's representative or distributor caused or contributed to this event.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|