|
The reported event could not be confirmed, as the affected device was not returned and no supporting evidence was provided.Device inspection could not be performed because the product was not returned for investigation.A review of the device history records for the reported lot did not identify any abnormalities.No corrective actions are required at this time.A review of the product labeling did not identify any abnormalities.No indications of material, manufacturing, or design-related issues were identified during the investigation.Failure of total ankle replacement (tar) over time is a known complication.In cases involving a planned revision procedure, a medical assessment aimed at determining the root cause of failure is part of the internal investigation process.Adequate radiological and clinical information must be provided to enable a meaningful clinical evaluation and to identify potential causes of failure.When a ct scan is the only available clinical information, the assessment remains limited.No conclusive determination can be made due to the absence of key clinical information, including patient clinical status, specific symptoms, range of motion, and evaluation by the treating physician.The root causes of radiographic findings, such as radiolucent areas and bone cysts, are often complex and multifactorial and cannot be scientifically determined without sufficient supporting evidence.Due to these limitations, no conclusions can be drawn regarding the patient, the procedure, or the device in relation to the cause of failure.Additional detailed information regarding the complaint event and the affected device is required to determine the root cause.If the device is returned or additional information becomes available, the investigation will be reassessed.
|