| Model Number |
L300 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Interrogation Problem (4017)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/23/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This product investigation is still in progress.This report will be updated when product investigation is complete.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this pacemaker was unable to be interrogated.Technical services (ts) noted based on the age of the device, it may no longer be functional.Ts also recommended trying to place a magnet.It was noted the patient presented to the physician to discuss device replacement.This pacemaker remains in service and no adverse patient effects were reported.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this pacemaker was unable to be interrogated.Technical services (ts) noted based on the age of the device, it may no longer be functional.Ts also recommended trying to place a magnet.It was noted the patient presented to the physician to discuss device replacement.This pacemaker remains in service and no adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information was received and it was reported that this pacemaker was explanted and successfully replaced.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This pacemaker has not been returned for analysis.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This product investigation is still in progress.This report will be updated when product investigation is complete.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that this pacemaker was unable to be interrogated.Technical services (ts) noted based on the age of the device, it may no longer be functional.Ts also recommended trying to place a magnet.It was noted the patient presented to the physician to discuss device replacement.This pacemaker remains in service and no adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information was received and it was reported that this pacemaker was explanted and successfully replaced.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This pacemaker has not been returned for analysis.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
This device was explanted and was not returned.As such, physical analysis has not been conducted in our laboratory.Based on the available information, and in the absence of a product return, the investigation conclusion code no problem detected was selected.As no further information concerning this report is expected, our investigation is complete.This investigation will be updated should further information be provided.A review of the device history record (dhr) was performed.The review of the dhr identified that there were no process related non-conformances, scrap, or rework performed during the production that could explain the event.The reviews ensure each device meets specification prior to release for use.There is no indication the device manufacturing process contributed to the reported complaint.A risk review was completed and confirmed that the event of difficult to interrogate/telemetry (wand) was defined in the risk documentation.This event type has been accounted for during product risk analysis to support acceptable risk benefit for the product.Review of labeling determined that the complaint situation was listed in the manual.There was no indication in the complaint that the product was not used in accordance with labeling.The manual was unlikely to be the cause of the reported complaint; translation, wording, or graphics does not require further review.If pertinent information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|