• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 MESH - VENTRALEX; SURGICAL MESH

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643 MESH - VENTRALEX; SURGICAL MESH Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 0010303
Medical Device Problem Code Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
Health Effect - Clinical Codes Adhesion(s) (1695); Hernia (2240)
Date of Event 02/09/2010
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.This mdr represents the ventralex mesh (device 1).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the ventralex mesh (device 2).Note: the manufacturing date (15-may-2007) is considered to be a best estimate.Note: section a through f: the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
 
Event or Problem Description
Per information provided: on (b)(6) 2009, patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent open repair with implant of ventralex mesh (device 1).Per op notes, ¿the hernia sac was encountered and resected.The hernia contents were reduced.A ventralex mesh (device 1) was placed in the defect and secured using sutures.¿ on (b)(6) 2010, patient was diagnosed with recurrent incisional hernia thereby underwent laparoscopic repair with implant of synthetic mesh.Per op notes, ¿all the adhesions of abdominal wall were taken down.The incisional hernia defect was noted and the prior patch (device 1) not covering the defect well caused recurrence.A synthetic mesh was placed in the defect and sutured.The mesh was tacked circumferentially using tacks.¿ on (b)(6) 2018, patent underwent repair with implant of ventralex mesh (device 2) (note: there is no operative notes provided for this procedure in ppf and medical records).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MESH - VENTRALEX
Common Device Name
SURGICAL MESH
Manufacturer (Section D)
DAVOL INC., SUB. C.R. BARD, INC. -1213643
100 crossings blvd.
warwick RI 02886
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SHANNON LIMITED -3005636544
san geronimo industrial park
lot #1, road #3, km 79.7
humacao PR 00791
Manufacturer Contact
andrew topoulos
100 crossings blvd.
warwick, RI 02886
8005566756
MDR Report Key24756075
Report Number1213643-2026-00413
Device Sequence Number21027616
Product Code FTL
UDI-Device Identifier00801741016486
UDI-Public(01)00801741016486(17)120628(10)HURE1029
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter StateIL
Initial Reporter CountryUS
PMA/510(K) Number
K132441
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Device Implanted Year2009
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Other,Consumer
Initial Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date (Section B) 03/25/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/28/2012
Device Catalogue Number0010303
Device Lot NumberHURE1029
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Type of Report(Section G)Thirty-Day
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/16/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/01/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) No
Date Device Manufactured05/15/2007
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Required Intervention;
Patient Age47 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-