|
|
| Catalog Number |
0112970 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Patient-Device Incompatibility (2682)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
Hernia (2240)
|
| Date of Event |
04/19/2021
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Root cause is inconclusive; no conclusion can be made as to the extent to which the implant may have caused or contributed to the patient's postoperative course.Note, the manufacturing date (15-jun-2013) is considered to be a best estimate.This mdr represents the perfix plug (device 2).An additional supplemental emdr was submitted to represent the perfix plug (device 1).Note: the attorney firm representing the patient is located in puerto rico; however, the mesh was implanted in the u.S., and the adverse event also occurred in the u.S.Note: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
Per information provided: (b)(6) 2013 - patient was diagnosed with bilateral inguinal hernias thereby underwent open repair with the implant of two perfix plugs (device 1 and 2).Per op notes, "two perfix plugs and patch (device 1 and 2) were placed on both right and left side of the inguinal floor." (b)(6) 2021 - patient was diagnosed with bilateral inguinal hernia thereby underwent robotic repair with the implant of two 3dmax meshes (device 3 and 4).Per op notes, "there were bilateral indirect inguinal hernias, both indirect inguinal hernias were reduced.Previous plugs were noticed, two 3dmax meshes (device 3 and 4) were placed into the preperitoneal space on both sides.".
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|