|
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ROTAWIRE? DRIVE AND WIRECLIP? TORQUER; CATHETER, CORONARY, ATHERECTOMY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
H74939463001 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Perforation of Vessels (2135); Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
|
| Date of Event |
01/01/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
B3: date of event: date of event was approximated to (b)(6) 2026 since the only given information is the month and year only.Good faith effort attempts were made to try and retrieve additional details regarding the reported event, but further information was unable to be obtained.Additionally, detailed product information was not provided to bsc.We completed a good faith effort to obtain the information.Because the product is unknown at this time, we are unable to provide the complete unique identifier (udi) # and other specific product information.If additional details become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that a device detachment occurred, resulting in vessel perforation and an unretrieved device fragment that required additional intervention.The patient presented for left and right heart catheterization with coronary angiography and impella support.The target lesion was located in the right coronary artery (rca).A rotawire drive and rotapro were selected for use.During the procedure, the rotawire extra support broke during a rotational atherectomy run, resulting in vessel perforation and a retained wire fragment.A covered stent was placed to stabilize the perforation, followed by two additional stents to secure the retained wire in place and open vessel.The physician then requested intubation, a code was called, and a pericardial drain was placed with reinfusion of blood via sheath.While this was a complex cardiac catheterization case with an inherently increased risk of complications, the physician opted to retain the wire fragment in place due to the patient's critical condition.A subsequent echocardiogram revealed that the pericardial effusion had resolved completely, and the patient was stabilized.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
B3 - date of event: date of event was approximated to january 1, 2026 since the only given information is the month and year only.Good faith effort attempts were made to try and retrieve additional details regarding the reported event, but further information was unable to be obtained.Additionally, detailed product information was not provided to bsc.We completed a good faith effort to obtain the information.Because the product is unknown at this time, we are unable to provide the complete unique identifier (udi) # and other specific product information.If additional details become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.The device was not returned for analysis; therefore, a technical analysis could not be performed.Device history record (dhr) review: the device history record review could not be performed due to the lack of a batch number.Investigation conclusion: this investigation has been assigned the conclusion code of adverse event related to procedure following a review of the reported event details, an available information.It is likely that the issue could be related to factors that can occur with the interaction between the rotapro and rotawire, as well as operational factors such as handling/technique at the moment to manipulate both devices, causing the reported event.To conclude, regarding the patient and impact codes perforation, vessel, pericardial effusion, unretrieved device fragments (udf), additional device required, blood transfusion and intubation.The assigned cause code since as a result of the reported detachment of the rotawire, a perforation occurred, causing that an additional was required to stent the detached portion in place, leading to a pericardial effusion, blood transfusion and intubation for the patient, which can be attributable to factors that can occur during procedure with the use of the device.Additionally, according to medical review, the clinical event is anticipated in nature and severity.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported via voluntary medwatch report #(b)(4) that a device detachment occurred, resulting in vessel perforation and an unretrieved device fragment that required additional intervention.The patient presented with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (copd), coronary heart disease, and hypertension, and underwent left and right heart catheterization with coronary angiography and impella support.The target lesion was located in the right coronary artery (rca).A rotawire drive and rotapro were selected for use.During the procedure, the rotawire extra support broke during a rotational atherectomy run, resulting in vessel perforation and a retained wire fragment.A covered stent was placed to stabilize the perforation, followed by two additional stents to secure the retained wire in place and open vessel.The physician then requested intubation, a code was called, and a pericardial drain was placed with reinfusion of blood via sheath.While this was a complex cardiac catheterization case with an inherently increased risk of complications, the physician opted to retain the wire fragment in place due to the patient's critical condition.A subsequent echocardiogram revealed that the pericardial effusion had resolved completely, and the patient was stabilized.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|