|
The agent reported, "revision female 72yrs".The previous surgery and the surgery detailed in this event occurred 1 month, 25 days apart.Item number: 508-32-105.Item description: altivate reverse glenosphere 32mm/-6mm w/retaining screw.Lot number: 4477a1170.Part revision: b.Product type: shoulder.Manufacture date: 10-oct-2025.Expiration date: 28-sep-2030.This evaluation is limited in scope as the item(s) associated with this investigation was not returned to djo surgical - austin for examination.The surgery was completed as intended and without incident and no delay.If additional information regarding the reported event is submitted at a future date, this investigation will be re-evaluated.There was no information submitted with this complaint about any patient activities, accidents, or medical contraindications that may have contributed to the reported event.Except for an undocumented nickel allergy.There were no findings during this evaluation that indicate that the reported device(s) was defective.The surgeon performed this procedure to remedy the patient's condition.No further action is deemed necessary.Root cause: the root cause of this complaint is a revision surgery due to unknown reason.No information was submitted with the complaint regarding the patient's pre-existing conditions or any other activities the patient was involved in that may have contributed to the event.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an event that are outside of the control of enovis surgical.Containment: inventory containment is not required as there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.The revision surgery was completed successfully.Device history records review: a review of the device history records (dhr) show that the reported components used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There was a ncmr-77900 associated with the main part # 508-32-105, altivate reverse glenosphere 32mm/-6mm w/retaining screw which document that out of 15 parts lot, 1 part was rejected due to distortion lines on top of part.Later, the rejected part was reworked and accepted after proper justification.All other items in the lot met fit, form and function requirements.The devices were verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and were within its expiration date at the time of the previous surgery.Complaint history: customer complaint history of the reported device(s) showed no present trends or ongoing issues that need review.
|