| Model Number |
365501 |
| Medical Device Problem Code |
Fracture (1260)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Code |
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
| Date of Event |
03/17/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Serious Injury
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Combination product: yes.Biotronik submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Biotronik has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by biotronik, or its employees that the device, biotronik, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Biotronik will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
This rv lead was explanted due to fracture.No other adverse patient events were reported.Should additional information be received, this file will be updated.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Combination product: yes.Upon receipt, the lead under complaint was found cut 12 cm distal to the is-1 connector pin (into 2 segments).An extraction aid was found on the distal fragment, it is reasonable to assume that the lead was cut during the surgery.The insulation was found rubbed through 15 cm proximal to the lead tip.In this region the conductor cable leading to the ring electrode was found fractured.Based on the characteristics of these damages, it is reasonable to assume that the lead had been subject to severe mechanical stress in the implanted state.Significant lead motion in the area of the tricuspid valve and interaction with atypical tissues should be taken into consideration.Furthermore, the rv shock coil was found deformed, which most likely resulted from the extraction procedure due to tensile stress.Prior to the analysis of the device, the quality documents accompanying the manufacturing process for this device were re-investigated.All production steps were performed accordingly, and in particular the final acceptance test proved the device functions to be as specified.In conclusion, the analysis did not reveal any sign of a material or manufacturing problem.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|