|
The healthcare professional reported that during an endovascular embolization procedure, the microcatheter was in place and the 1.00mm x 2.00cm galaxy g3 mini (glm910020 / 1762505s) was delivered to the target site.The coil was packed in the aneurysm, and the physician attempted to detach the coil, but the coil as unable to detach.The physician retracted the coil and replaced it and the connecting cable for the microcoil delivery system (ccb00015700 / 1412502s) to complete the procedure using the same original microcatheter.There was no report of any negative patient impact.The procedure was prolonged by about 10 minutes.On 06-apr-2026, additional information was received.Per the information, the procedure was targeting the left posterior communicating artery.The coil was successfully removed from the patient; it was not stretched when it was removed.The coil was still attached to the delivery system.A pre-deployment electrical check was performed.The fault light was not seen during the procedure.Upon pressing the power button, all lights illuminated.The green system ready light also illuminated.During the detachment cycle, the detachment light did not illuminate, and the audible signal beep was not heard.The replacement coil was another 1.00mm x 2.00cm galaxy g3 mini (glm910020) and the replacement connecting cable was another ccb00015700.The information confirmed there was no negative impact on the patient and the physician did not consider the reported 10-minute procedure extension to be clinically significant.
|
|
Manufacturer¿s ref.No: (b)(4).Information regarding patient identifier, date of birth, age, sex, gender, weight, race, and ethnicity were not provided.Section d.2b: procode is krd/hcg.Section e.1: initial reporter facility name: per new requirement from cac (cyberspace administration of china), in case complaint reporter¿s hospital is related to military, police department, military academy/institution, political party, government organ/agency or classified unit [1], the name of such employer should be desensitized and redacted prior to be transferred abroad.The account name and facility name were not allowed to be displayed in the relevant area.Section e.1: the initial reporter phone: (b)(6).Based on complaint information, the device is not available to be returned for analysis.A review of manufacturing documentation associated with this lot (1762505s) presented no issues during the manufacturing or inspection processes related to the reported complaint.There were no internal actions related to device manufacture or inspection.Product analysis cannot be conducted as the product was not returned for analysis.No determination of causes and possible contributing factors could be made.As such, the investigation will be closed.With the limited information available and without the product available for analysis, the reported issue documented in the complaint could not be confirmed.Based on the manufacturing documentation review, there is no indication that the event is related to the device manufacturing process.The exact cause of the event could not be conclusively determined; however, it is possible that circumstances of the procedure and / or device manipulation / interaction may have contributed to the reported failure.As part of the post market surveillance program, information from this complaint is trended for statistical signals and corrective / preventive action may be triggered later.Since there was no evidence to suggest the event was related to a manufacturing or design issue, no corrective actions will be taken at this time.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by cerenovus, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, cerenovus, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Missing information from this report is identified as blank; this information was not provided in the reported event or available at the time of report submission.The manufacturer will submit a supplemental report if new facts arise which materially alter information submitted in a previous mdr report.Additional information will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
|