|
MEDTRONIC MEXICO S. DE R.L. DE CV EVOLUT FX PLUS VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
|
Back to Search Results |
|
| Model Number |
EVFXPLUS-26 |
| Medical Device Problem Codes |
Insufficient Device Problem Information (3190); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
| Health Effect - Clinical Codes |
Cardiac Arrest (1762); Rupture (2208); Pericardial Effusion (3271)
|
| Date of Event |
04/07/2026
|
|
Type of Reportable Event
|
Death
|
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Section d references the main component of the system.Other medical products in use during the event include: brand name evolut fx dcs; product id d-evolutfx-2329 (lot: unknown); product type: 0195-heart valves; h6.The codes present in section h6.Correspond to multiple components/products that comprise this reported event.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a transcatheter aortic valve implant procedure, a pre-implant balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav) was com pleted due to calcification.The delivery catheter system (dcs) was then inserted into the patient and advanced to the native aortic annulus.The valve was then partially deployed in that it was positioned approximately 4 millimeters (mm) from the non-coronary cusp (ncc) and 4 mm from the left coronary cusp (lcc).Despite following training guidance for slow deployment of the valve and centering of the dcs nosecone by slightly retracting the guidewire, the nosecone suddenly moved during final deployment, causing dcs interaction with the valve.This interaction caused the valve to embolize into the patient's ascending aorta.Subsequently, the attending physician opted to attempt implantation of a second valve, so a new valve was prepared and loaded into the dcs.As the dcs was advanced towards the aortic annulus, the previously dislodged valve became unstable.Therefore, a snare was utilized to grasp the dislodged valve to maintain its position in relation to the great vessels as the second valve was successfully implanted.After implantation of the second valve, an echocardiogram was obtained which revealed a considerable pericardial effusion.In response, emergent surgical pericardiocentesis was performed with the implementation of an evacuation tube.The patient was then intubated, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cpr) was performed, but ultimately the patient died.Per the physician, the patient's death was due to pericardial effusion that was caused by "rupture" due to the dislodged valve.Per the physician, the dcs, valve, and procedure contributed to the patient's death.Per the physician, the patient's anatomy contributed to sudden change of dcs nosecone position when deploying the valve that led to valve dislodgement.
|
| |
|
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
|
|
Updated data: b5.D.This is a system report.The section d.Information is for the primary device, which was in use with the following device(s) which cannot be excluded as potential contributing factors to the adverse event: medtronic brand name: deliv sys d-evolutfx-2329; product id: d-evolutfx-2329; lot: 0013259443; udi: (b)(4); manufactured date: 2026-01-27; use by date: 2028-01-27; implant date: n/a; fda site id: 9612164.H6.Annex a code, annex b codes.Corrected data: h6.Annex e code was erroneously omitted from the initial medwatch.Medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
|
| |
|
Event or Problem Description
|
|
It was reported that during a transcatheter aortic valve implant procedure, a pre-implant balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav) was completed due to calcification.The delivery catheter system (dcs) was then inserted into the patient and advanced to the native aortic annulus.The valve was then partially deployed in that it was positioned approximately 4 millimeters (mm) from the non-coronary cusp (ncc) and 4 mm from the left coronary cusp (lcc).Despite following training guidance for slow deployment of the valve and centering of the dcs nosecone by slightly retracting the guidewire, the nosecone suddenly moved during final deployment, causing dcs interaction with the valve.This interaction caused the valve to embolize into the patient's ascending aorta.Subsequently, the attending physician opted to attempt implantation of a second valve, so a new valve was prepared and loaded into the dcs.As the dcs was advanced towards the aortic annulus, the previously dislodged valve became unstable.Therefore, a snare was utilized to grasp the dislodged valve to maintain its position in relation to the great vessels as the second valve was successfully implanted.After implantation of the second valve, an echocardiogram was obtained which revealed a considerable pericardial effusion.In response, emergent surgical pericardiocentesis was performed with the implementation of an evacuation tube.The patient was then intubated, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (cpr) was performed, but ultimately the patient died.Per the physician, the patient's death was due to pericardial effusion that was caused by "rupture" due to the dislodged valve.Per the physician, the dcs, valve, and procedure contributed to the patient's death.Per the physician, the patient's anatomy contributed to sudden change of dcs nosecone position when deploying the valve that led to valve dislodgement.Additional information was received that the transfemoral approach was used as the access site.The cuspal overlap technique was not used as the physician does not use this technique.After reviewing the post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) transesophageal echocardiogram (tee), the physician believes an annular rupture occurred.Per the physician, the second valve and second dcs did not cause or contribute to the death, and there were no complaints with the medtronic guidewire in relation to the death.
|
| |
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|