• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. PROXIMATE; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC. PROXIMATE; STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number TLC10
Medical Device Problem Code Failure to Form Staple (2579)
Health Effect - Clinical Code Insufficient Information (4580)
Date of Event 03/26/2026
Type of Reportable Event Serious Injury
Event or Problem Description
It was reported that during an open anterior resection of recto sigmoid colon, creation of end colostomy, rectus sheath catheter insertion x2.Linear stapler misfired while stapling across large bowel.Staples fired, but did not curl.Upon realizing, surgeon asked for a reload.Stapler misfired a second time.Again, stapler fired, but the staples did not curl.Additional time under anesthesia and prolonged care.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) date sent: 4/13/2026 d4: batch # unk.Attempts have been made to retrieve the device.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device lot number, and no non-conformance were identified.Attempts are being made to obtain the following information.To date no response has been provided.If further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.What were the indications for surgery? did the patient receive any preoperative chemotherapy or radiation? what color reloads were used and what was the sequence of the firings? what was the reason for using a 100mm device? were other stapling or suturing devices used when creating the anastomosis? how was the common opening closed? was the device difficult to assemble/close? was the device difficult to fire; was the force to fire higher than expected? how was the integrity of the anastomosis checked intraoperatively? please describe the staple formation across the staple line.What intervention was done intra-operatively? was there a surgical intervention? if so, please describe.What is the current status of the patient? please provide the status of the device(s) as it has not been received for analysis.If the device has been shipped, please provide the shipment tracking details.Thank you.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by ethicon, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, ethicon, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
 
Additional Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Date sent: 5/4/2026.D4: batch # 694d04.Investigation summary: the product was returned to ethicon endo-surgery for thorough evaluation, which included visual inspections and functional testing of the returned device.Visual analysis of the returned sample revealed that the tlc10 device was received with no apparent damage and with two reloads (b and c) present along with the device.Both reloads were returned fully fired with the swing tab in locked position.Further evaluation shows the pin latch visibly off-center, having shifted significantly toward the right side, however this condition does not cause functional impact.The device was tested for functionality with a test reload and it fired, cut, and formed all the staples as intended.The staple line and cut line were complete, and the staples meet the staple form release criteria.In addition, a tyvek was returned along with the device.The event described could not be confirmed as the device was returned without detectable damage.As part of ethicon endo surgery¿s quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.Device history review: a manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device batch number 694d04, and no non-conformances were identified.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROXIMATE
Common Device Name
STAPLE, IMPLANTABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON ENDO-SURGERY, LLC.
475 calle c
guaynabo 00969
Manufacturer Contact
orla o'mahony
475 calle c
guaynabo 
3035526892
MDR Report Key24865138
Report Number3005075853-2026-02796
Device Sequence Number9239497
Product Code GDW
UDI-Device Identifier10705036003120
UDI-Public(01)10705036003120(17)300831(10)A98R8F
Combination Product (Y/N)N
Initial Reporter CountryCA
PMA/510(K) Number
K020779
Number of Events Summarized1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Serviced by Third Party (Y/N)Unknown
Reporter Type Manufacturer
Report Source Foreign
Initial Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date (Section B) 05/04/2026
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Operator of Device Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberTLC10
Device Lot NumberA98R8F
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Type of Report(Section G)Follow-Up
Initial Date Received by Manufacturer 03/30/2026
Supplement Date Received by Manufacturer04/17/2026
Initial Report FDA Received Date04/13/2026
Supplement Report FDA Received Date05/04/2026
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? (Y/N) Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/04/2025
Is the Device Labeled for Single Use? (Y/N) Yes
Is This a Single-Use Device that was
Reprocessed and Reused on a Patient? (Y/N)
No
Usage of Device Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Outcome Attributed to Adverse Event Hospitalization;
Patient SexUnknown
-
-